Every category where a model named IBM MaaS360 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Unified endpoint management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	31 of 52	33%	15	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for IBM MaaS360 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated IBM MaaS360 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	1	2	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative14 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative14 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“tend to appeal more to security-conscious or compliance-heavy enterprises” Perplexity Sonar · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Security-focused; PeerSpot top 5” Grok 4.1 Fast · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“The platforms to treat most cautiously ... are Omnissa/Workspace ONE and IBM MaaS360.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · UEM · negative prompt · hard negative

“it typically starts around $3.00–$4.00 per device per month. This is roughly 3x the cost of ManageEngine.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · UEM · budget prompt · soft negative

“may not be the best option for organizations with a diverse device ecosystem” Llama 4 Maverick · UEM · negative prompt · soft negative

“Most enterprise solutions (VMware, MobileIron, IBM) require custom quotes” Kimi K2 · UEM · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as IBM MaaS360, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM MaaS360 was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Intune42 of 4426Not in the top three

Omnissa Workspace ONE42 of 443Not in the top three

Jamf33 of 441Not in the top three

ManageEngine Endpoint Central25 of 442Not in the top three

NinjaOne17 of 440Not in the top three

Hexnode UEM13 of 440Not in the top three

Ivanti12 of 440Not in the top three

42Gears SureMDM10 of 440Not in the top three

BlackBerry UEM8 of 440Not in the top three

SOTI8 of 440Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named IBM MaaS360. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 40 of the 44 answers that named IBM MaaS360 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org27

gbhackers.com27

syncrosecure.com23

cybersecuritynews.com22

expertinsights.com22

peerspot.com17

venn.com14

cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com13

gartner.com13

ciopages.com12

190 of the 190 domain citations in answers naming IBM MaaS360 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gbhackers.com/best-uem-solutions-compared26

cyberpress.org/uem-solutions-by-business-size23

syncrosecure.com/blog/unified-endpoint-management-tools23

expertinsights.com/it-management/the-top-unified-endpoint-management-uem-solutions18

cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com/is/content/microsoftcorp/microsoft/final/en-us/microsoft-bran13

cybersecuritynews.com/best-uem-solutions/amp13

ciopages.com/buyer-guides/endpoint-management-uem12

miradore.com/blog/best-unified-endpoint-management-tools12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as IBM MaaS360

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as IBM MaaS360; a claim can dispute any of them.

IBM 3IBM Security MaaS360 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IBM MaaS360's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IBM MaaS360, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ibm.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.