Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 49 → 52 of 53
IBM · 1 category · RankedIBM MaaS360
61Judge labels
1First choices
24Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in UEM for mid-market buyers
Rank 17 of 53 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 17 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of IBM MaaS360 →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business58 of 59
0%19 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market17 of 53
0%17 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise8 of 57
0%24 labels
accepted challenger
In uem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named IBM MaaS360 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unified endpoint management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 17 of 53 | 18% | 17 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, IBM MaaS360 held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · UEM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 28 → 18 of 48
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 6 → 8 of 53
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UEM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 17 of 53 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated IBM MaaS360 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated IBM MaaS360 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase8 labels1
Comparative20 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative17 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative61 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“more of an enterprise console-first platform, often selected for centralized governance” Perplexity Sonar · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best For: Industries with high security requirements (finance, healthcare)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: AI-driven threat analytics and compliance-driven industries” MiniMax M2.5 · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative
“If security and compliance are paramount: BlackBerry UEM or MaaS360.” Kimi K2 · UEM · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“IBM MaaS360 – legacy tech, poor value, weak support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · UEM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Its non-intuitive interface makes the platform better suited to large enterprises with dedicated IT staff” Claude Haiku 4.5 · UEM · negative prompt · soft negative
“lower price points compared to enterprise heavyweights like VMware Workspace ONE or IBM MaaS360” Qwen 3.7 Flash · UEM · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as IBM MaaS360, over the 61 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM MaaS360 was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as IBM MaaS360, over the 61 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM MaaS360 was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named IBM MaaS360. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 57 of the 61 answers that named IBM MaaS360 and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
miradore.com33
venn.com29
guideflow.com28
syncrosecure.com27
gbhackers.com26
cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com21
expertinsights.com21
cybersecuritynews.com19
g2.com19
manageengine.com18
241 of the 241 domain citations in answers naming IBM MaaS360 came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where IBM MaaS360 stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where IBM MaaS360 stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“ibm maas360”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 52 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on IBM's site (ibm.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 17 of 53 in UEM
Segment leader
39%
Microsoft Intune
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 61 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 57 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as IBM MaaS360
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as IBM MaaS360; a claim can dispute any of them.
IBM 2IBM Security MaaS360 2
Follow IBM MaaS360
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
IBM is the company behind IBM MaaS360.ShowHide
The company
IBM is the company behind IBM MaaS360.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Manage and protect your mobile workforce with AI-driven unified endpoint management (UEM)
- For
- knowledge worker; frontline device management
- Price stated
- Starting at $4.24 USD per client device per month; Starting at $5.30 USD per client device per month; Starting at $6.63 USD per client device per month; Starting at $9.54 USD per client device per month; Starting at $1.50 USD per client device per month ibm.com/products/maas360
- Starting price
- 1.50 ibm.com/products/maas360
- Free plan or trial
- Try IBM Security MaaS360 free for 30 days and get started in just minutes. ibm.com/products/maas360
- Customers named
- Credico
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What IBM MaaS360's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ibm.com/products/maas360, developer.ibm.com/tutorials/awb-integrating-maas360-cloud-extender-openldap, developer.ibm.com/articles/awb-qradar-maas360-defend-against-malicious-software, developer.ibm.com/articles/awb-enhance-mobile-security-maas360-location-detection, ibm.com/products/maas360/byod. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IBM MaaS360's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IBM MaaS360, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for IBM MaaS360 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where IBM MaaS360 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name IBM MaaS360, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.