IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Torii · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Torii

15Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Torii was named 5 times in ITAM and 1 other category, where Snipe-IT led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business48 of 73

under the label threshold

Mid-market22 of 61

under the label threshold

Enterprise41 of 83

under the label threshold

In itam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Torii for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
IT asset management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	22 of 61	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Snipe-IT at 24%
Identity governance	Identity and access	0%	57 of 77	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Lumos at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Torii yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Torii across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative2 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Torii or Zluri: Industry leaders in automated SaaS discovery, license harvesting” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITAM · scale prompt · alternative

“SaaS‑heavy or license optimization focus – Oomnitza, Torii, Zluri.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ITAM · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for B2B SaaS Sprawl & Spend Management: Zluri or Torii” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ITAM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Torii, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Torii was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Zluri8 of 151Not in the top three

Lumos7 of 151Not in the top three

Corma7 of 150Not in the top three

Saviynt Enterprise Identity Cloud7 of 150Not in the top three

ServiceNow IT Asset Management6 of 153Not in the top three

SailPoint6 of 150Not in the top three

Freshservice5 of 151Not in the top three

Lansweeper5 of 150Not in the top three

One Identity Manager5 of 150Not in the top three

Setyl4 of 152Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Torii. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 15 answers that named Torii and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com8

corma.io7

oneidentity.com5

expertinsights.com4

linx.security4

securends.com4

zluri.com4

blog.invgate.com3

credentialgovernance.avatier.com3

lumos.com3

Forty-five of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming Torii came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

corma.io/blog/best-iga-solutions-for-mid-market-companies7

gartner.com/reviews/market/identity-governance-administration7

linx.security/blog/top-10-iga-tools-a-modern-identity-governance-buyers-guide4

oneidentity.com/learn/top-5-identity-governance-and-administration-tools-in-2025.aspx4

securends.com/blog/best-iga-solutions-and-tools4

blog.invgate.com/it-asset-management-software3

credentialgovernance.avatier.com/en/blog/best-identity-governance-administration-solutions3

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-identity-governance-and-administrati3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Torii's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Torii, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at toriihq.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.