| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS management platforms | IT operations and endpoint | 4% | 5 of 64 | 16% | 51 | accepted challenger | |
| IT financial management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 49 of 159 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Nicus ITFM Platform at 9% | |
| Enterprise architecture tools | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 61 of 113 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SAP LeanIX at 25% | |
| Microsoft 365 management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 78 of 149 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CoreView at 20% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 9 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Zylo is currently the market leader in SaaS management... they remain a top choice for smaller companies because of their "Starter" or free tiers.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SaaS management · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd generally recommend Zylo if your main goal is SaaS spend visibility, license optimization, and renewal management” GPT-5.4 mini · SaaS management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Zylo (Gartner Leader) | Enterprises with high SaaS spend ($500K+) | Spend optimization using $75B+ data benchmarks” Grok 4.20 · SaaS management · comparative prompt · first choice
“Often positioned as a strong all-around SaaS management leader, with high user ratings and broad platform visibility.” Perplexity Sonar · SaaS management · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Platforms to Avoid on a Tight Budget ... Zylo | Starts at ~$30,000/year” Kimi K2 · SaaS management · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Budget ... Zylo (starting ~$30K/year)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SaaS management · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Zylo, Productiv, and BetterCloud.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SaaS management · negative prompt · hard negative
“the standard enterprise SaaS Management Platforms (SMPs) like Zylo, Productiv, or BetterCloud are usually out of the question” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SaaS management · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 168 of the 179 answers that named Zylo and are not a share of its labels.
541 of the 625 domain citations in answers naming Zylo came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 557 | 93 | 2026-09-29 | ITAM, FinOps | |
| News or press | 76 | 23 | 2026-09-23 | ITAM | |
| Podcast or video | 44 | 0 | 2025-09-30 | ||
| Report or ebook | 12 | 1 | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Comparison | 9 | 5 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Case study | 8 | 3 | 2026-07-22 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | 3 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Template or tool | 7 | 1 | 2026-07-15 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 0 | 2026-06-18 | ||
| Conference or event | 5 | 1 | 2026-08-31 | ITAM |
Every page zylo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Zylo's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: zylo.com, zylo.com/pricing, trust.zylo.com, zylo.com/product/clarity-ai, zylo.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zylo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zylo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zylo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: