Every category where a model named Kandji for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Unified endpoint management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	15 of 52	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Intune at 43%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Kandji yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Kandji across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase9 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained8 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“consider Jamf or Kandji ... usually less budget-friendly for a mixed-device environment” GPT-5.4 mini · UEM · budget prompt · alternative

“A newer, modern player focused on simplicity and automation... Excellent UX.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · UEM · scale prompt · alternative

“Apple-native UEMs like Jamf or Kandji for managing macOS and iOS fleets” Gemini 3.5 Flash · UEM · negative prompt · alternative

“Apple-first fleet \u2192 Consider Jamf or Kandji” DeepSeek V4 Flash · UEM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kandji, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kandji was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Intune30 of 3420Not in the top three

Jamf27 of 340Not in the top three

NinjaOne16 of 340Not in the top three

Omnissa Workspace ONE16 of 340Not in the top three

ManageEngine Endpoint Central15 of 340Not in the top three

Hexnode UEM13 of 340Not in the top three

JumpCloud10 of 341Not in the top three

Miradore9 of 344Not in the top three

Ivanti6 of 340Not in the top three

Automox5 of 341Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kandji. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 34 answers that named Kandji and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org10

gbhackers.com10

cybersecuritynews.com9

syncrosecure.com8

expertinsights.com7

miradore.com7

g2.com6

getprimo.com5

microsoft.com5

ninjaone.com5

Seventy-two of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming Kandji came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cyberpress.org/uem-solutions-by-business-size9

syncrosecure.com/blog/unified-endpoint-management-tools8

cybersecuritynews.com/best-uem-solutions/amp6

gbhackers.com/best-uem-solutions-compared6

miradore.com/blog/best-unified-endpoint-management-tools6

expertinsights.com/it-management/the-top-unified-endpoint-management-uem-solutions5

gbhackers.com/best-mdm-solutions-compared5

softwareadvice.com/unified-endpoint-management5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kandji's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kandji, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at kandji.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.