IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Mosyle · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Mosyle

25Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in UEM for small business buyers
Rank 17 of 52 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In uem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mosyle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Unified endpoint managementIT operations and endpoint0%17 of 5212%8under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Intune at 43%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mosyle yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mosyle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00202
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00112
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Apple-heavy fleet | Mosyle | Fast setup, low cost, Apple-focused with security bundle.” Grok 4.1 Fast · UEM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“often become prohibitively expensive once you scale past the initial license tiers” Qwen 3.7 Flash · UEM · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mosyle, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mosyle was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Microsoft Intune23 of 2511Not in the top three
Miradore16 of 257Not in the top three
Hexnode UEM16 of 251Not in the top three
Jamf16 of 250Not in the top three
ManageEngine Endpoint Central10 of 251Not in the top three
NinjaOne10 of 250Not in the top three
Omnissa Workspace ONE9 of 250Not in the top three
Scalefusion8 of 252Not in the top three
JumpCloud6 of 252Not in the top three
ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus5 of 251Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mosyle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 25 answers that named Mosyle and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gbhackers.com18
cyberpress.org13
syncrosecure.com12
cybersecuritynews.com11
softwareadvice.com11
miradore.com10
mdmbuyer.com9
superops.com9
expertinsights.com7
g2.com7

107 of the 107 domain citations in answers naming Mosyle came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mosyle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mosyle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mosyle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.