Every category where a model named Scalefusion for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Unified endpoint management	IT operations and endpoint	4%	6 of 52	0%	17	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Scalefusion yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Scalefusion across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	2	2
Mistral Small	0	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	3	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labelsNone

Paraphrase11 labels3

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative41 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Scalefusion for mixed fleets that also want built-in identity and endpoint security” Claude Haiku 4.5 · UEM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“My Final Recommendation: Start with a trial of Scalefusion.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · UEM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Scalefusion or Hexnode are excellent options. They are specifically built with the mid-market in mind.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · UEM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Other options include Scalefusion, which is suitable for mid-market and Android-heavy deployments” Llama 4 Maverick · UEM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Scalefusion, over the 41 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Scalefusion was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Intune33 of 4118Not in the top three

NinjaOne25 of 411Not in the top three

Hexnode UEM24 of 411Not in the top three

ManageEngine Endpoint Central23 of 418Not in the top three

Jamf19 of 410Not in the top three

Omnissa Workspace ONE17 of 410Not in the top three

JumpCloud14 of 415Not in the top three

Miradore12 of 415Not in the top three

Mosyle8 of 410Not in the top three

Syncro6 of 410Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Scalefusion. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 41 answers that named Scalefusion and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org27

syncrosecure.com23

expertinsights.com22

gbhackers.com22

cybersecuritynews.com21

learn.g2.com13

superops.com13

miradore.com12

g2.com11

getapp.com11

175 of the 175 domain citations in answers naming Scalefusion came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cyberpress.org/uem-solutions-by-business-size23

syncrosecure.com/blog/unified-endpoint-management-tools23

expertinsights.com/it-management/the-top-unified-endpoint-management-uem-solutions18

gbhackers.com/best-uem-solutions-compared14

superops.com/uem/best-uem-software12

cybersecuritynews.com/best-uem-solutions11

cybersecuritynews.com/best-uem-solutions/amp11

gbhackers.com/best-mdm-solutions-compared11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Scalefusion's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Scalefusion, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at scalefusion.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.