IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Miradore · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Miradore

49Judge labels
16First choices
2Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
28% in UEM for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 52 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 11 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In uem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Miradore for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Unified endpoint managementIT operations and endpoint7%4 of 520%11accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Miradore yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Miradore across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.1 Fast10001
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels5
Paraphrase7 labels1
Comparative8 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained17 labels10
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative6 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative49 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 25 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Miradore is the best budget-focused choice because it is repeatedly highlighted for SMBs and has a free plan” Perplexity Sonar · UEM · budget prompt · first choice
“If you don't use Microsoft, go with Miradore if you have 50 or fewer devices (essentially free)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · UEM · budget prompt · first choice
“Miradore stands out as the best unified endpoint management (UEM) platform” Grok 4.1 Fast · UEM · budget prompt · first choice
“Another option is Miradore, which is a top-recommended UEM solution for small businesses and MSPs, with a free plan” Llama 4 Maverick · UEM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Miradore, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Miradore was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Microsoft Intune42 of 4914Not in the top three
Hexnode UEM32 of 490Not in the top three
Jamf24 of 490Not in the top three
NinjaOne23 of 491Not in the top three
JumpCloud19 of 491Not in the top three
ManageEngine Endpoint Central19 of 491Not in the top three
Omnissa Workspace ONE19 of 490Not in the top three
Mosyle16 of 490Not in the top three
Scalefusion12 of 491Not in the top three
Kandji9 of 490Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Miradore. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 49 answers that named Miradore and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

miradore.comYour site32
gbhackers.com30
syncrosecure.com30
cyberpress.org27
softwareadvice.com25
superops.com21
expertinsights.com20
g2.com20
cybersecuritynews.com16
getapp.com15

204 of the 236 domain citations in answers naming Miradore came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Miradore

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Miradore; a claim can dispute any of them.
Miradore (by GoTo) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Miradore's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Miradore, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at miradore.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack