AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › HUMAN Security › Alternatives · October 2026 Edition
Two categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to HUMAN Security, as AI models named them

In the October 2026 Edition, 463 of the 504 answers collected in the two categories where HUMAN Security holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 463 answers that did not name HUMAN Security, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Bot management

Network and edge. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when HUMAN Security is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessHUMAN Security holds 8 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-four of the eighty-four answers did not name HUMAN Security; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-four answers, twenty products in all, the eight most named:

12 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketHUMAN Security is #4 of 9 here at 2% of first choices, 18 labels.

Seventy-five of the eighty-four answers did not name HUMAN Security; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those seventy-five answers, ten products in all, the eight most named:

2 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseHUMAN Security is #4 of 8 here at 4% of first choices, 28 labels.

Sixty-three of the eighty-four answers did not name HUMAN Security; it was the first choice in five. The first choices in those sixty-three answers, nineteen products in all, the eight most named:

11 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

Client-side protection

Security operations. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when HUMAN Security is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessHUMAN Security is #9 of 9 here at 0% of first choices, 12 labels.

Eighty-three of the eighty-four answers did not name HUMAN Security; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-three answers, forty products in all, the eight most named:

32 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketHUMAN Security is #8 of 8 here at 0% of first choices, 12 labels.

Eighty of the eighty-four answers did not name HUMAN Security; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those eighty answers, twenty-five products in all, the eight most named:

17 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseHUMAN Security is #10 of 10 here at 2% of first choices, 14 labels.

Seventy-eight of the eighty-four answers did not name HUMAN Security; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those seventy-eight answers, twenty-four products in all, the eight most named:

16 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled HUMAN Security neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named HUMAN Security only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from HUMAN Security's side.

Every answer and every label behind these figures is in the record, sent on request. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of HUMAN Security was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.