| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bot management | Network and edge | 22% | 2 of 83 | 12% | 49 | accepted challenger | |
| Web application firewalls | Network and edge | 0% | 36 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare WAF at 69% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“DataDome | Real-time, multi-surface protection | Sub-2ms latency, <0.01% false positives, strong API/mobile coverage, 24/7 SOC | Can be pricier” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Bot management · scale prompt · first choice
“If you have the budget (~$45k/year) and want the highest protection with the least amount of internal work, go with DataDome.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Bot management · direct prompt · first choice
“DataDome (Leader in Forrester Wave) ... Superior AI-agent trust management, zero-friction UX, and excellent API-level protection.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Bot management · comparative prompt · first choice
“DataDome and Akamai Bot Manager are the top choices due to their balance of effectiveness, scalability, and pricing” Mistral Small · Bot management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“If you are currently evaluating dedicated bot-management vendors (such as DataDome, HUMAN, Kasada, Akamai, or F5), watch out for these contract and technical warning signs” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Bot management · negative prompt · soft negative
“DataDome's published Essentials plan starts at $3,830/month, so I'd reserve it for a clear need and budget.” GPT-6 Luna · Bot management · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“No free tier (free trial only) | Enterprise‑only pricing (custom quotes) ... can budget >$200/mo” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Bot management · budget prompt · soft negative
“you do not need to pay for high-end enterprise solutions like DataDome, Akamai, or HUMAN Security” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Bot management · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 138 of the 149 answers that named DataDome and are not a share of its labels.
527 of the 580 domain citations in answers naming DataDome came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 50 | undated | |||
| News or press | 3 | 3 | 2026-09-22 |
Every page datadome.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What DataDome's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: datadome.co, trust.datadome.co. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DataDome's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DataDome, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DataDome by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
DataDome is among the products AI models recommend first in Bot management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.