IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Bitdefender GravityZone Small Business Security · September 2026 Edition
Bitdefender · 1 category · Ranked

Bitdefender GravityZone Small Business Security

13Judge labels
6First choices
0Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
13% in Endpoint protection for small business buyers
Rank 33 of 99 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In endpoint protection · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bitdefender GravityZone Small Business Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Endpoint protectionIT operations and endpoint0%33 of 990%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Cloud at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bitdefender GravityZone Small Business Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bitdefender GravityZone Small Business Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase5 labels4
Comparative1 label1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“is the strongest budget-oriented alternative, with low per-device pricing, cloud management, and strong independent-test performance” Perplexity Sonar · Endpoint protection · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bitdefender GravityZone Small Business Security, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bitdefender GravityZone Small Business Security was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Microsoft Defender for Cloud12 of 136Not in the top three
ESET PROTECT5 of 130Not in the top three
CrowdStrike Falcon Go4 of 130Not in the top three
ESET3 of 130Not in the top three
Huntress Managed EDR3 of 130Not in the top three
Norton Small Business2 of 130Not in the top three
SentinelOne2 of 130Not in the top three
SentinelOne Singularity2 of 130Not in the top three
Sophos Intercept X2 of 130Not in the top three
Webroot2 of 130Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bitdefender GravityZone Small Business Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Bitdefender GravityZone Small Business Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gbhackers.com10
tekpon.com10
expertinsights.com9
huntress.com8
cyberpress.org7
techrepublic.com6
cybersecuritynews.com5
cyberwise.almontsf.com5
sentinelone.com5
ifeeltech.com4

Sixty-nine of the sixty-nine domain citations in answers naming Bitdefender GravityZone Small Business Security came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bitdefender GravityZone Small Business Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bitdefender GravityZone Small Business Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bitdefender.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack