AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › c/side · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

c/side

16Judge labels
7First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Client-side protection for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 120 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In client-side protection · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named c/side for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Client-side protectionSecurity operations7%4 of 1200%7under 10 labels · led by cside at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for c/side yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated c/side across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash21003
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K220002
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels2
Paraphrase5 labels3
Comparative4 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labels2
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“My top pick: For most small-to-mid-size companies, c/side at $99/month delivers enterprise-grade client-side protection” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Client-side protection · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need to block attacks in real time before they execute → c/side or Source Defense” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Client-side protection · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with c/side (free tier) or Source Defense Essentials ($98/month)” Kimi K2 · Client-side protection · direct prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: c/side” Kimi K2 · Client-side protection · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as c/side, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and c/side was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Reflectiz13 of 164Not among the top eight
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity11 of 161Not among the top eight
Cloudflare Page Shield7 of 160Not among the top eight
Source Defense7 of 160Not among the top eight
Cloudflare Client-Side Security6 of 161Not among the top eight
Feroot PaymentGuard6 of 160Not among the top eight
Feroot Security5 of 160Not among the top eight
HUMAN Security2 of 160Not among the top eight
Imperva Client-Side Protection2 of 160Not among the top eight
Microsoft Defender for Cloud2 of 160Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named c/side. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named c/side and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cside.comYour site15
g2.com12
reflectiz.com12
sourceforge.net11
slashdot.org8
geeksframework.com7
feroot.com6
developers.cloudflare.com4
fintechspecs.com4
imperva.com4

Sixty-eight of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming c/side came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

cside.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, c/side takes 7% of first choices and cside takes 13%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “client-side protection tool”
8
Position for “client-side protection tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
not counted (“c/side”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2,981 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 3,519 a month
Searches its site ranks for
692 · 12 in the top three
Sites linking to it
8,959
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
29 ads · 13 image, 11 video, 5 text · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2025, as Client-side Development Inc,., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 6 in the year, 23 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
7%
rank 4 of 120 in client-side protection
Segment leader
13%
cside
First choices
7 across its categories
Named in
16 answers
Its own site cited
in 16 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on cside.com
3,522
subdomains included
Content
472
counted in the table below
Documentation
160
Product · Integration
32 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog311undatedMFA, CDN
Glossary or explainer106undatedWAF
Comparison48undatedClient-side protection
Webinar or virtual event5undated
Case study1undated
Template or tool1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page cside.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow c/side

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

c/side is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Client-side security platform that detects script attacks, AI agents, account takeover, and fraud at the browser layer, and automates PCI DSS 4.0.1 requirements 6.4.3 and 11.6.1.
For
eCommerce and SaaS companies
Price stated
Free plan stays free. Business from $99 /month. Enterprise custom. cside.com
Starting price
0 cside.com
Free plan or trial
Free plan with basic monitoring features; 14-day free trial cside.com
Certifications
PCI DSS 4.0.1SOC 2 Type IIGDPRPCI DSS 4.0.1 requirements 6.4.3 and 11.6.1Attestation of Compliance (AoC)SOC 2PCI DSSVikingCloud solution assessment
Hosting
Worldwide
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, customers

What c/side's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cside.com, cside.com/pricing, trust.cside.com, cside.com/solutions/csp, cside.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when c/side's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as c/side, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for c/side by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where c/side is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name c/side, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cside.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.