| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extended detection and response | Security operations | 2% | 9 of 61 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender XDR at 63% |
| Endpoint protection | IT operations and endpoint | 2% | 10 of 99 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger |
| Endpoint detection and response | Security operations | 2% | 9 of 54 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Bitdefender GravityZone at 20% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ESET Protect Advanced is often recommended for its balance of protection, ease of use, and low overhead” Mistral Small · Endpoint protection · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“ESET PROTECT Enterprise is a particularly strong choice for mid-sized organizations.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · XDR · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Ranked as the best overall EDR for small and mid-size businesses in 2026” Mistral Small · EDR · budget prompt · first choice
“A lightweight prevention solution ideal for mid-sized organizations seeking reliable protection with low system impact.” Llama 4 Maverick · Endpoint protection · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 57 of the 58 answers that named ESET PROTECT and are not a share of its labels.
200 of the 200 domain citations in answers naming ESET PROTECT came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ESET PROTECT's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ESET PROTECT, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at eset.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.