| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extended detection and response | Security operations | 19% | 2 of 58 | 8% | 24 | accepted challenger | ▲+18Since September 2026: 2% → 20%, +18 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Endpoint detection and response | Security operations | 6% | 6 of 55 | 5% | 39 | accepted challenger | ▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Endpoint protection | IT operations and endpoint | 5% | 5 of 86 | 12% | 42 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Client-side protection | Security operations | 0% | 69 of 120 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by cside at 13% | |
| AI security platforms | Security operations | 0% | 136 of 233 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11% | |
| Vulnerability management platforms | Security operations | 0% | 59 of 77 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 30% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XDR | 2% | 20% | ▲+18Since September 2026: 2% → 20%, +18 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 7 → 2 of 58 |
| EDR | 0% | 6% | ▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 6 of 55 |
| Endpoint protection | 8% | 4% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 5 of 86 |
| Client-side protection | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 69 of 120, unchanged |
| AI security | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 136 of 233, unchanged |
| Vuln management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 59 of 77, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 14 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 11 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 10 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most mid-market B2B companies: Start with Sophos Intercept X/XDR. It offers the best balance of prevention, ease of use, and optional managed services” Qwen 3.7 Flash · XDR · direct prompt · first choice
“My Pick for Most Mid-Market B2B: Sophos Intercept X edges out due to Gartner leadership, mid-market pricing, and simplicity with optional MDR.” Grok 4.20 · EDR · direct prompt · first choice
“"Best for balanced SMB to mid-market coverage: Sophos Endpoint, strong endpoint protection software for business with simple admin."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Endpoint protection · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Sophos Intercept X or SentinelOne Singularity offer the best balance of protection, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness” Kimi K2 · XDR · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Some platforms like Sophos Endpoint have received complaints about slow performance on older systems and high resource usage affecting productivity” MiniMax M2.5 · Endpoint protection · negative prompt · soft negative
“I would evaluate Carbon Black/Broadcom and Sophos carefully for fit rather than assuming they are best-in-class” Perplexity Sonar · EDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“Platforms like CrowdStrike and Sophos can be prohibitively expensive for smaller organizations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Endpoint protection · negative prompt · soft negative
“Good protection but consistent performance hits ... with user complaints about resource usage.” Grok 4.20 · Endpoint protection · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 252 of the 275 answers that named Sophos Intercept X and are not a share of its labels.
774 of the 774 domain citations in answers naming Sophos Intercept X came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Sophos Intercept X's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: developer.sophos.com/endpoint-software, developer.sophos.com/endpoint-device-software, sophos.com/es-es/products/endpoint-security, sophos.com/es-es/products/xdr-with-next-gen-siem, sophos.com/es-es/resources/sophos-edr-solution-brief. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sophos Intercept X's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sophos Intercept X, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sophos Intercept X by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Sophos Intercept X is among the products AI models recommend first in Extended detection and response this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.