Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 24 → 22 of 73
ESET · 1 category · Named, not rankedESET Endpoint Security
3Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ESET Endpoint Security was named 1 time in Endpoint protection, where Microsoft Defender for Endpoint led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business23 of 78
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market31 of 86
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In endpoint protection · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ESET Endpoint Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint protection | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 31 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ESET Endpoint Security held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Endpoint protection · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 18 → 29 of 83
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint protection | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 31 of 86 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ESET Endpoint Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ESET Endpoint Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative2 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ESET or Sophos Intercept X are excellent alternatives” Mistral Small · Endpoint protection · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ESET Endpoint Security, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ESET Endpoint Security was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ESET Endpoint Security, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ESET Endpoint Security was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ESET Endpoint Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named ESET Endpoint Security and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
deel.com2
guideflow.com2
techrepublic.com2
venn.com2
axis-intelligence.com1
comparitech.com1
cside.com1
cybersecuritynews.com1
docs.broadcom.com1
f6s.com1
Fourteen of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming ESET Endpoint Security came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
eset.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, ESET Endpoint Security takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
eset.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, ESET Endpoint Security takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “endpoint protection platform”
2
Position for “endpoint protection platforms”
3
- Its company's site
- eset.com shared with ESET's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 637,959 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 26,448 · 2,085 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 49,182
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 42 clicks and $4,397 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 31 of 86 in endpoint protection
Segment leader
22%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 3 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 3 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow ESET Endpoint Security
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ESET is the company behind ESET Endpoint Security.ShowHide
The company
ESET is the company behind ESET Endpoint Security.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Protect your business desktop and mobile endpoints with award-winning IT security solutions from ESET.
- For
- business desktop and mobile endpoints
- Price stated
- Kaina pateikiama pagal užklausą eset.com/lt/verslui/endpoint-secure-business
- Free plan or trial
- Request a business trial eset.com/nz/business/endpoint-security
- Customers named
- Mitsubishi MotorsHonda PhilippinesPinewood Healthcare Ltd.Mercury EngineeringUnigarantSWFC
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What ESET Endpoint Security's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: eset.com/nz/business/endpoint-security, eset.com/na/business/endpoint-protection, eset.com/uy/empresas/proteccion-endpoints, eset.com/ph/business/endpoint-security-mac, eset.com/lt/verslui/endpoint-secure-business. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ESET Endpoint Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ESET Endpoint Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ESET Endpoint Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ESET Endpoint Security is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ESET Endpoint Security, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.