| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint protection | IT operations and endpoint | 20% | 2 of 99 | 0% | 29 | accepted challenger |
| Endpoint detection and response | Security operations | 20% | 1 of 54 | 0% | 42 | accepted challenger |
| Extended detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 20 of 61 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender XDR at 63% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 9 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Consistently ranked as a top choice for mid-market organizations due to its strong malware detection, low system impact, and ease of use.” Mistral Small · Endpoint protection · direct prompt · first choice
“If you're not on E5 → Bitdefender GravityZone or Sophos Endpoint are the most balanced choices for a mid-sized B2B company” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Endpoint protection · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder: Bitdefender GravityZone ... frequently cited as the best value for mid-market companies.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · EDR · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Bitdefender GravityZone or SentinelOne offer the best balance of protection, manageability, and cost” MiniMax M2.5 · Endpoint protection · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 141 of the 162 answers that named Bitdefender GravityZone and are not a share of its labels.
529 of the 529 domain citations in answers naming Bitdefender GravityZone came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bitdefender GravityZone's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bitdefender GravityZone, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bitdefender.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.