SentinelOne · 7 categories · RankedSentinelOne Singularity
355Judge labels
24First choices
34Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
7Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in EDR for small business buyers
Rank 6 of 54 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 16% of its 45 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business3 of 40
10%55 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market6 of 54
8%45 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise3 of 50
7%59 labels
accepted challenger
In edr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SentinelOne Singularity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint detection and response | Security operations | 8% | 6 of 54 | 16% | 45 | accepted challenger |
| Extended detection and response | Security operations | 5% | 3 of 61 | 5% | 37 | accepted challenger |
| Endpoint protection | IT operations and endpoint | 4% | 5 of 99 | 0% | 20 | accepted challenger |
| Container and Kubernetes security | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 40 of 78 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Aqua Security at 18% |
| Attack surface management | Security operations | 0% | 83 of 104 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 59% |
| Cloud-native application protection | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 34 of 57 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 46% |
| Cloud security posture management | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 32 of 53 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 43% |
Movement
This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SentinelOne Singularity yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.
By model
How each model treated SentinelOne Singularity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 5 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 15 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 11 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 11 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 12 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct74 labels6
Paraphrase58 labels7
Comparative101 labels14not counted in share
Budget-constrained39 labels6
Scale-constrained42 labels5
Negative41 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative355 labels in all, every segment counted; 24 of the 40 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“SentinelOne Singularity: Excellent local threat mitigation, offline capability, and famous for its "Rollback" feature. Typically very friendly to mid-sized budgets” Gemini 3.5 Flash · EDR · scale prompt · first choice
“Verdict: Highly recommended for mid-market companies that have a small IT team but want premium, autonomous Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Endpoint protection · direct prompt · first choice
“Sophos Intercept X with Sophos MDR or SentinelOne Singularity with Vigilance MDR are the safest and most operationally efficient choices.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Endpoint protection · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you want the absolute best "turnkey" Native XDR with automated containment: SentinelOne Singularity: Highly autonomous” Gemini 3.5 Flash · XDR · scale prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Cautions: Occasional false positives/alert issues, compatibility/migration challenges, less mature ecosystem/threat intel depth, weaker non-Windows support.” Grok 4.1 Fast · EDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“buying a native XDR platform (such as those from CrowdStrike, Palo Alto, Microsoft, SentinelOne, Trend Micro, Sophos, Trellix, or Cisco)” Mistral Small · XDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“Solid technical alternative, but operational reliability and detection accuracy have been questioned in recent tests.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · EDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“SentinelOne offers strong technology but requires investment in tuning and tolerance for support friction.” Kimi K2 · EDR · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SentinelOne Singularity, over the 355 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SentinelOne Singularity was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SentinelOne Singularity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 286 of the 355 answers that named SentinelOne Singularity and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
gbhackers.com206
cyberpress.org161
cybersecuritynews.com143
decryptiondigest.com95
sentinelone.comYour site93
paloaltonetworks.com92
huntress.com81
gartner.com67
acronis.com60
guideflow.com57
962 of the 1,055 domain citations in answers naming SentinelOne Singularity came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as SentinelOne Singularity
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SentinelOne Singularity; a claim can dispute any of them.
SentinelOne 32SentinelOne Singularity XDR 12SentinelOne Singularity Complete 2SentinelOne Singularity Core 2SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint 2SentinelOne (Singularity XDR) 1SentinelOne Singularity Cloud 1SentinelOne Singularity Commercial 1SentinelOne Singularity Platform 1
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SentinelOne Singularity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SentinelOne Singularity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sentinelone.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.