Huntress · 4 categories · RankedHuntress Managed EDR
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed detection and response | Security operations | 26% | 2 of 45 | 0% | 38 | accepted challenger |
| Endpoint detection and response | Security operations | 14% | 3 of 54 | 0% | 34 | accepted challenger |
| Endpoint protection | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 20 of 99 | 11% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Cloud at 22% |
| Extended detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 16 of 61 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender XDR at 63% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 13 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Huntress Managed EDR is rated 4.8/5 on G2 based on 800+ user reviews and has repeatedly ranked as the #1 Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solution for small businesses and mid-market” Claude Haiku 4.5 · EDR · direct prompt · first choice
“Huntress Managed EDR is an excellent alternative to CrowdStrike, delivering enterprise-grade detection without the complexity, steep learning curve, or high cost” Claude Haiku 4.5 · EDR · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Huntress delivers the best value for small businesses and the MSPs who serve them. Huntress Managed EDR received the highest rating of 9.3 among leaders” Claude Haiku 4.5 · MDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“mid-market specialists like Arctic Wolf, Huntress, or Sophos often fit better than pure enterprise plays” Grok 4.1 Fast · MDR · scale prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Consider Huntress Managed EDR, but it is usually more about service quality than lowest price.” Perplexity Sonar · Endpoint protection · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 209 of the 240 answers that named Huntress Managed EDR and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
745 of the 875 domain citations in answers naming Huntress Managed EDR came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Huntress Managed EDR
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Huntress Managed EDR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Huntress Managed EDR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at huntress.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.