AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › IT operations and endpoint › Endpoint protection › CrowdStrike Falcon vs ESET PROTECT
Endpoint protection · October 2026 Edition

CrowdStrike Falcon vs ESET PROTECT

Five of fourteen models named CrowdStrike Falcon first on the direct prompt; zero named ESET PROTECT. CrowdStrike Falcon was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and ESET PROTECT by nine and CrowdStrike Falcon carries 41 labels and ESET PROTECT 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.

CrowdStrike Falcon

accepted challenger

Named in twelve categories this edition.

ESET PROTECT

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

First-choice share12%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate22%6%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#8A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4116A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, CrowdStrike Falcon reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Sophos Intercept X was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon · Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs ESET PROTECT · Bitdefender GravityZone vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the endpoint protection page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CrowdStrike FalconFirst choices, of fourteen modelsESET PROTECT
Direct502 against CrowdStrike Falcon
Paraphrase101 against CrowdStrike Falcon
Comparative90
Budget-constrained01
Scale-constrained10
Negative026 against CrowdStrike Falcon · 1 against ESET PROTECT
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where CrowdStrike Falcon and ESET PROTECT stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
CrowdStrike Falcon ESET PROTECT first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, CrowdStrike Falcon on the left and ESET PROTECT on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where CrowdStrike Falcon and ESET PROTECT stood in it.

CrowdStrike Falcon first, ESET PROTECT not the choice

5 of 14 modelsESET PROTECT was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniCrowdStrike Falcon alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint, Sophos Intercept X
Mistral SmallBitdefender GravityZone, CrowdStrike Falcon alternatives: Acronis Cyber Protect
GLM 4.7 FlashXCrowdStrike Falcon alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Sophos Intercept X
MiniMax M2.5Bitdefender GravityZone, CrowdStrike Falcon alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Sophos Intercept X
GPT-6 LunaCrowdStrike Falcon alternatives: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarBitdefender GravityZone alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Intercept X
DeepSeek V4 FlashSentinelOne Singularity alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Business / Endpoint, Sophos Intercept X
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint, Sophos Intercept X, Trend Vision One
Kimi K2Microsoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity
Muse Glimmer 30BBitdefender GravityZone Business Security, Microsoft Defender for Business / Defender for Endpoint alternatives: CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Intercept X

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Sophos Intercept X alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR
Gemini 3.5 FlashSophos Intercept X alternatives: Huntress Managed EDR, Microsoft Defender for Business / Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity
Grok 4.1 FastMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: Bitdefender GravityZone, SentinelOne Singularity, Sophos Intercept X
Llama 4 MaverickBitdefender GravityZone

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
CrowdStrike Falcon0%#12 of 12
ESET PROTECT0%#8 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
CrowdStrike Falcon leads by ten points.
CrowdStrike Falcon12%#4 of 11
ESET PROTECT2%#8 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
CrowdStrike Falcon leads by thirty-five points.
CrowdStrike Falcon35%#2 of 9
ESET PROTECT0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about CrowdStrike Falcon

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“CrowdStrike Falcon (with significant caveats) ... It's still a strong product, but the outage demonstrated that relying on any single endpoint platform carries systemic risk.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Why to be cautious: If you choose CrowdStrike, do not allow the vendor to automatically push kernel-level updates to your entire fleet instantly.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“with CrowdStrike positioned highest on both "Ability to Execute" and "Completeness of Vision" (for the fifth consecutive year)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose CrowdStrike if you have a complex enterprise fleet (including significant macOS and Linux deployments)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“CrowdStrike Falcon - Leader in enterprise endpoint security ... Best for threat hunting and telemetry depth” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about ESET PROTECT

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“often praised, but the same source flags limited control over Linux endpoints as a drawback to validate” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Prioritize vendors that hold "Product of the Year" or "Certified EPR" status, such as ESET, Bitdefender, SentinelOne, and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“or basic ESET PROTECT tiers. These options offer a good balance between cost and features” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Prioritize leaders from 2024 tests: ESET PROTECT” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.