Four of fourteen models named Bitdefender GravityZone first on the direct prompt; zero named ESET PROTECT. Bitdefender GravityZone was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and ESET PROTECT by nine and Bitdefender GravityZone carries 34 labels and ESET PROTECT 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the endpoint protection page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Bitdefender GravityZone and ESET PROTECT were named in the same answer seventeen times, of the 105 answers naming Bitdefender GravityZone and the 83 naming ESET PROTECT. In those answers ESET PROTECT took the first choice zero times and Bitdefender GravityZone seven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“may not be best for teams needing highly customized reports or fully managed security services” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“starting with a pilot of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint ... or Bitdefender GravityZone (if you want simplicity and cost predictability)” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“such as ESET, Bitdefender, SentinelOne, and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which generally balance detection, low latency” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“the two most highly recommended solutions are Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Bitdefender GravityZone” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“often praised, but the same source flags limited control over Linux endpoints as a drawback to validate” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Prioritize vendors that hold "Product of the Year" or "Certified EPR" status, such as ESET, Bitdefender, SentinelOne, and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“or basic ESET PROTECT tiers. These options offer a good balance between cost and features” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Prioritize leaders from 2024 tests: ESET PROTECT” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.