Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 20 of 69, unchanged
CyberArk MFA
2Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CyberArk MFA was named 2 times in MFA, where Cisco Duo led with 47%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market23 of 77
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In mfa · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named CyberArk MFA for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-factor authentication | Identity and access | 0% | 23 of 77 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Cisco Duo at 47% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, CyberArk MFA held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · MFA · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MFA | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 23 of 77, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated CyberArk MFA across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated CyberArk MFA across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Need PAM + MFA combined | CyberArk MFA” MiniMax M2.5 · MFA · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CyberArk MFA, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CyberArk MFA was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CyberArk MFA, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CyberArk MFA was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CyberArk MFA. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named CyberArk MFA and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
expertinsights.com2
frontegg.com2
checkthat.ai1
cofes.com1
duo.com1
encomputers.com1
freemindtronic.com1
help.okta.com1
index.dev1
infisign.ai1
Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming CyberArk MFA came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
cyberark.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CyberArk MFA takes 0% of first choices and Cisco Duo takes 47%.ShowHide
Search and answers
cyberark.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CyberArk MFA takes 0% of first choices and Cisco Duo takes 47%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “mfa solution”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “mfa solutions”
–
not in the top ten
- Its company's site
- cyberark.com shared with CyberArk's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 147,793 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 8,049 · 538 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 13,201
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 4 clicks and $62 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 77 in MFA
Segment leader
47%
Cisco Duo
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 2 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 2 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow CyberArk MFA
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
CyberArk is the company behind CyberArk MFA.ShowHide
The company
CyberArk is the company behind CyberArk MFA.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The integration of CyberArk Workforce and Palo Alto Networks Cloud Identity Engine provides a robust solution for secure access, reducing the risk of cyberattacks, lowering costs, and improving user productivity.
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What CyberArk MFA's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: paloaltonetworks.com/resources/techbriefs/palo-alto-networks-and-cyberark, paloaltonetworks.com/resources/techbriefs/paloaltonetworks-cyberark-unified-identity-security, paloaltonetworks.com/resources/whitepapers/redefining-post-login-security-with-cyberark-secure-web-sessions, paloaltonetworks.com/resources/whitepapers/redefining-post-login-security-with-cyberark-secure-web-sessions.viewer.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CyberArk MFA's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CyberArk MFA, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CyberArk MFA by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where CyberArk MFA is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name CyberArk MFA, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.