IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › CyberArk Privileged Access Manager · September 2026 Edition

CyberArk · 1 category · Named, not ranked

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

9Judge labels

3First choices

5Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager was named 2 times in PAM, where ManageEngine PAM360 led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business44 of 55

under the label threshold

Mid-market70 of 74

under the label threshold

Enterprise3 of 49

under the label threshold

In pam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CyberArk Privileged Access Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Privileged access management	Identity and access	0%	70 of 74	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by ManageEngine PAM360 at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CyberArk Privileged Access Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative1 label1not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Not recommended for very limited budgets unless you have a specific requirement.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PAM · budget prompt · hard negative

“While not a mid‑market primary pick... despite higher cost and longer deployment.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PAM · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BeyondTrust6 of 90Not in the top three

Delinea Secret Server4 of 91Not in the top three

Delinea4 of 90Not in the top three

ManageEngine PAM3604 of 90Not in the top three

Teleport3 of 90Not in the top three

ARCON PAM2 of 90Not in the top three

Okta Privileged Access2 of 90Not in the top three

StrongDM2 of 90Not in the top three

JumpServer1 of 91Not in the top three

Admin By Request1 of 90Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 9 answers that named CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cybervendorguide.com5

startwithidentity.com5

expertinsights.com4

aimultiple.com3

gartner.com3

beyondtrust.com2

cyberark.comYour site2

cyberpress.org2

decryptiondigest.com2

delinea.com2

Twenty-eight of the thirty domain citations in answers naming CyberArk Privileged Access Manager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cybervendorguide.com/guides/privileged-access-management5

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/the-top-privileged-access-management-pam4

aimultiple.com/pam-solutions3

gartner.com/reviews/market/privileged-access-management3

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-pam-for-enterprises3

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-pam-tools3

decryptiondigest.com/blog/privileged-access-management-tools-comparison2

ecommercefastlane.com/best-privileged-access-management-platform2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CyberArk Privileged Access Manager; a claim can dispute any of them.

CyberArk Privileged Account Security 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CyberArk Privileged Access Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cyberark.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.