| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI security platforms | Security operations | 4% | 9 of 233 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11% | |
| LLM gateways and observability | Data platform | 2% | 7 of 69 | 3% | 29 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The safest bets are Cloudflare AI Gateway for hosted, or Kong self-hosted for enterprise compliance.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · LLM gateways · negative prompt · first choice
“If I had to pick only one tool to start with, I would choose Cloudflare AI Gateway.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI security · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Cloudflare AI Gateway (Best Freemium/SaaS Option) ... The core gateway is 100% free” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI security · budget prompt · first choice
“For most budget-conscious companies, I'd start with Cloudflare AI Gateway” GPT-6 Luna · LLM gateways · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Insanely fast, great for basic caching and logging, but lacks deep enterprise budgeting/RBAC controls.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · LLM gateways · scale prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 77 of the 78 answers that named Cloudflare AI Gateway and are not a share of its labels.
277 of the 277 domain citations in answers naming Cloudflare AI Gateway came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Cloudflare AI Gateway's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: developers.cloudflare.com/ai-gateway, blog.cloudflare.com/announcing-ai-gateway, blog.cloudflare.com/guardrails-in-ai-gateway, blog.cloudflare.com/identity-aware-ai-gateway, blog.cloudflare.com/workers-ai-gateway-unification. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cloudflare AI Gateway's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cloudflare AI Gateway, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cloudflare AI Gateway by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: