Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 4 → 5 of 46
Bitdefender · 2 categories · RankedBitdefender GravityZone EDR
60Judge labels
3First choices
3Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in EDR for mid-market buyers
Rank 7 of 55 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 26 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Bitdefender GravityZone EDR →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 49
2%24 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market7 of 55
4%26 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise11 of 47
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
In edr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Bitdefender GravityZone EDR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint detection and response | Security operations | 4% | 7 of 55 | 4% | 26 | accepted challenger | ▼−15Since September 2026: 20% → 4%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Client-side protection | Security operations | 0% | 41 of 120 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by cside at 13% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Bitdefender GravityZone EDR moved past the floor in its one category, EDR, −15 points to 4%.
Best category · EDR · by segment
Mid-market▼−15Since September 2026: 20% → 4%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 20% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 4 pointsRank 1 → 7 of 52
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 11 of 43
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDR | 20% | 4% | ▼−15Since September 2026: 20% → 4%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 1 → 7 of 55 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Bitdefender GravityZone EDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Bitdefender GravityZone EDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels1
Paraphrase10 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained15 labels2
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“best standalone value with published pricing you can budget from” Claude Haiku 4.5 · EDR · budget prompt · first choice
“1. Bitdefender - Best mid-market value” Llama 4 Maverick · EDR · direct prompt · first choice
“Bitdefender GravityZone offers detection engines that consistently test at the top, with EDR capability at pricing mid-market organizations can approve” Claude Haiku 4.5 · EDR · direct prompt · alternative
“Want lowest per-endpoint cost: Bitdefender and Sophos are the most frequently cited budget picks for mid-market.” Muse Glimmer 30B · EDR · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Aggressive mid-market pricing | Less enterprise-grade depth” DeepSeek V4 Flash · EDR · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bitdefender GravityZone EDR was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bitdefender GravityZone EDR was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bitdefender GravityZone EDR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 58 of the 60 answers that named Bitdefender GravityZone EDR and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
huntress.com29
cybersecuritynews.com24
gbhackers.com24
sentinelone.com24
learn.g2.com23
consilien.com22
cyberpress.org22
kaseya.com21
cnicsolutions.com19
acronis.com18
226 of the 226 domain citations in answers naming Bitdefender GravityZone EDR came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Bitdefender GravityZone EDR stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Bitdefender GravityZone EDR stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“bitdefender gravityzone edr”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Bitdefender's site (bitdefender.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 7 of 55 in EDR
Segment leader
30%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 60 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 58 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Bitdefender GravityZone EDR; a claim can dispute any of them.
Bitdefender GravityZone 19Bitdefender 5Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security 1
Follow Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Bitdefender is the company behind Bitdefender GravityZone EDR.ShowHide
The company
Bitdefender is the company behind Bitdefender GravityZone EDR.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- O único EDR do mercado com correlação automatizada entre terminais e recursos robustos de EPP perfeitamente integrados.
- For
- equipes simples de TI e segurança
- Free plan or trial
- Iniciar avaliação gratuita bitdefender.com/pt-pt/business/products/gravityzone-xdr
- Hosting
- UE
- Customers named
- A Associação de Saúde dos Funcionários do GovernoCora Systems
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications
What Bitdefender GravityZone EDR's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: bitdefender.com/pt-pt/business/gravityzone-platform, bitdefender.com/pt-pt/business/infozone/what-is-edr, bitdefender.com/pt-pt/business/products/gravityzone-xdr, bitdefender.com/pt-pt/business/solutions/endpoint-security, bitdefender.com/en-au/business/products/enterprise-security. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bitdefender GravityZone EDR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bitdefender GravityZone EDR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.