| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint protection | IT operations and endpoint | 3% | 8 of 86 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Endpoint at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Client-side protection | Security operations | 2% | 12 of 120 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by cside at 13% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint protection | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 8 of 86 |
| Client-side protection | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 12 of 120, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (if you're already on Microsoft 365) or Bitdefender GravityZone give the best balance of price, protection, and manageability.” MiniMax M2.5 · Endpoint protection · budget prompt · first choice
“positioned as Best for SMBs and mid-market companies needing strong protection with minimal management overhead” Muse Glimmer 30B · Client-side protection · direct prompt · first choice
“Bitdefender is repeatedly called "Best Mid-Market Value"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Endpoint protection · direct prompt · first choice
“Best budget-friendly third-party option: often Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security” GPT-5.4 mini · Client-side protection · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 28 answers that named Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security and are not a share of its labels.
Eighty-five of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: bitdefender.com/pt-pt/business/smb-products, bitdefender.com/pt-pt/business/smb-products/business-security, bitdefender.com/en-sa/business/products/gravityzone-business-security, bitdefender.com/en-lv/business/products/gravityzone-business-security, bitdefender.com/en-bg/business/products/gravityzone-business-security. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: