IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security · September 2026 Edition
Bitdefender · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security

12Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
7 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security was named 3 times in Endpoint protection, where Microsoft Defender for Cloud led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In endpoint protection · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Endpoint protectionIT operations and endpoint2%13 of 990%3under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Cloud at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need a standalone solution, Bitdefender GravityZone offers the best balance of price” Kimi K2 · Endpoint protection · budget prompt · first choice
“Best detection per dollar (competes with premium tiers); full EDR in higher bundles.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Endpoint protection · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Microsoft Defender for Cloud9 of 127Not in the top three
SentinelOne Singularity5 of 121Not in the top three
Sophos Intercept X5 of 120Not in the top three
ESET PROTECT4 of 120Not in the top three
CrowdStrike Falcon3 of 121Not in the top three
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint3 of 120Not in the top three
Trend Micro Apex One3 of 120Not in the top three
CrowdStrike2 of 120Not in the top three
ESET2 of 120Not in the top three
CrowdStrike Falcon Go1 of 120Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 12 answers that named Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gbhackers.com8
cyberpress.org5
deel.com5
huntress.com5
bitdefender.comYour site4
getvendorsage.com4
guideflow.com4
microsoft.com3
reddit.com3
bellatorcyber.com2

Thirty-nine of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bitdefender.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack