IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Bitdefender GravityZone XDR · September 2026 Edition

Bitdefender · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR

9Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR was named 5 times in XDR, where Microsoft Defender XDR led with 63%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business14 of 54

under the label threshold

Mid-market21 of 61

under the label threshold

Enterprise18 of 47

under the label threshold

In xdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bitdefender GravityZone XDR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Extended detection and response	Security operations	0%	21 of 61	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender XDR at 63%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bitdefender GravityZone XDR yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bitdefender GravityZone XDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Tight budget, value-first | Bitdefender GravityZone XDR | Competent managed XDR for mid-market/SMBs” Grok 4.1 Fast · XDR · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best value for mid-market per GBHackers; Strong Performer in Forrester.” Grok 4.1 Fast · XDR · direct prompt · alternative

“Best value\u2011focused option: Bitdefender GravityZone XDR” GLM 4.7 FlashX · XDR · direct prompt · alternative

“4. Bitdefender GravityZone XDR — *Best Budget Option*” Kimi K2 · XDR · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“user reviews mention false positives and desire for better incident analysis and third-party integration” GPT-5.4 mini · XDR · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bitdefender GravityZone XDR was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Defender XDR9 of 94Not in the top three

SentinelOne Singularity6 of 90Not in the top three

Coro4 of 93Not in the top three

Palo Alto4 of 90Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon XDR3 of 91Not in the top three

Sophos Intercept X3 of 91Not in the top three

CrowdStrike Falcon3 of 90Not in the top three

Huntress Managed EDR3 of 90Not in the top three

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR3 of 90Not in the top three

Trend Vision One3 of 90Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bitdefender GravityZone XDR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Bitdefender GravityZone XDR and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org8

gbhackers.com8

cybersecuritynews.com6

esecurityplanet.com6

g2.com6

gartner.com6

paloaltonetworks.com6

forrester.com5

microsoft.com5

xdrcost.com5

Sixty-one of the sixty-one domain citations in answers naming Bitdefender GravityZone XDR came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cyberpress.org/xdr-platforms-by-business-size8

gbhackers.com/best-xdr-platforms-compared8

gbhackers.com/best-managed-xdr-compared7

esecurityplanet.com/products/xdr-security-solutions6

cybersecuritynews.com/best-xdr-platforms5

gartner.com/reviews/market/extended-detection-and-response5

xdrcost.com/4

cyberpress.org/managed-xdr-services-to-consider4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bitdefender GravityZone XDR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bitdefender.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.