Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 of 55, unchanged
Bitdefender · 1 category · RankedBitdefender GravityZone XDR
34Judge labels
1First choices
5Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in XDR for small business buyers
Rank 16 of 58 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Bitdefender GravityZone XDR →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business10 of 62
2%11 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market16 of 58
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise25 of 58
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
In xdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Bitdefender GravityZone XDR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extended detection and response | Security operations | 0% | 16 of 58 | 7% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Bitdefender GravityZone XDR held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · XDR · by segment
Mid-market▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 5 → 15 of 53
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 34 of 46
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XDR | 5% | 0% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 16 of 58 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Bitdefender GravityZone XDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Bitdefender GravityZone XDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“"Bitdefender is the value pick for mid-market organizations"” Muse Glimmer 30B · XDR · direct prompt · alternative
“noted as "best value" in managed XDR” Grok 4.20 · XDR · budget prompt · alternative
“Strong Performer; "reliable XDR."” Grok 4.20 · XDR · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Be cautious if you run heavy PowerShell, RMM scripts or CI/CD pipelines and don’t have time for pre-prod tuning.” Muse Glimmer 30B · XDR · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bitdefender GravityZone XDR was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bitdefender GravityZone XDR was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bitdefender GravityZone XDR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 34 answers that named Bitdefender GravityZone XDR and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
expertinsights.com25
paloaltonetworks.com21
coruzant.com20
aimultiple.com19
gbhackers.com17
gartner.com13
guideflow.com13
sentinelone.com12
crowdstrike.com11
cyberpress.org11
162 of the 162 domain citations in answers naming Bitdefender GravityZone XDR came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Bitdefender GravityZone XDR stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Bitdefender GravityZone XDR stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“bitdefender gravityzone xdr”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Bitdefender's site (bitdefender.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 58 in XDR
Segment leader
40%
Microsoft Defender XDR
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 34 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 34 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Bitdefender GravityZone XDR
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Bitdefender GravityZone XDR; a claim can dispute any of them.
Bitdefender 6Bitdefender GravityZone 4Bitdefender GravityZone / XDR 1Bitdefender XDR 1
Follow Bitdefender GravityZone XDR
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Bitdefender is the company behind Bitdefender GravityZone XDR.ShowHide
The company
Bitdefender is the company behind Bitdefender GravityZone XDR.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIs this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bitdefender GravityZone XDR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bitdefender GravityZone XDR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Bitdefender GravityZone XDR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bitdefender GravityZone XDR, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.