IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › AnyDesk · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

AnyDesk

10Judge labels

0First choices

9Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. AnyDesk was named 3 times in RMM, where NinjaOne led with 50%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business39 of 45

under the label threshold

Mid-market52 of 57

under the label threshold

Enterprise54 of 58

under the label threshold

In rmm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named AnyDesk for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Remote monitoring and management	IT operations and endpoint	0%	52 of 57	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by NinjaOne at 50%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AnyDesk yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AnyDesk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Any free/consumer-grade remote tool (TeamViewer, AnyDesk) for production MSP use” Kimi K2 · RMM · negative prompt · hard negative

“also named by CISA in the same malicious-use advisory as being abused by criminals” GPT-5.4 mini · RMM · negative prompt · soft negative

“(multiple vulnerabilities)” Mistral Small · RMM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AnyDesk, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AnyDesk was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TeamViewer8 of 100Not in the top three

Atera7 of 101Not in the top three

Kaseya VSA6 of 100Not in the top three

ConnectWise ScreenConnect5 of 100Not in the top three

NinjaOne4 of 101Not in the top three

Datto RMM4 of 100Not in the top three

SimpleHelp4 of 100Not in the top three

ConnectWise Automate3 of 101Not in the top three

Action13 of 100Not in the top three

MeshCentral3 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AnyDesk. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 10 answers that named AnyDesk and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

acronis.com8

reddit.com6

sentinelone.com5

aimultiple.com4

redcanary.com4

arcticwolf.com3

cisa.gov3

syncrosecure.com3

abcbyd.substack.com2

akshayjain.blog2

Forty of the forty domain citations in answers naming AnyDesk came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

acronis.com/en/tru/posts/the-remote-access-blind-spot-an-analysis-of-rmm-tool-risk-for-smb7

sentinelone.com/cybersecurity-101/cybersecurity/remote-monitoring-and-management-rmm5

aimultiple.com/rmm-software4

redcanary.com/threat-detection-report/trends/rmm-tools4

arcticwolf.com/resources/blog/understanding-the-risks-of-remote-monitoring-and-management-3

syncrosecure.com/blog/best-rmm-software3

abcbyd.substack.com/p/rmm-tools-the-good-the-bad-and-the2

acronis.com/en/blog/posts/compare-the-best-rmm-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AnyDesk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AnyDesk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at anydesk.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.