3 categories · RankedAnyDesk
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Remote support and remote access | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 15 of 77 | 22% | 51 | accepted challenger | |
| Remote monitoring and management | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 58 of 62 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by NinjaOne at 47% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Virtual desktops | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 64 of 81 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Azure Virtual Desktop at 22% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated AnyDesk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“reputable vendors like TeamViewer, AnyDesk, Splashtop, or similar. These companies invest heavily in security” MiniMax M2.5 · Remote support · negative prompt · first choice
“Known for its lightweight design and high-speed connections... a lighter, faster and lower-cost option with core remote access” Muse Glimmer 30B · Remote support · comparative prompt · alternative
“For fast, lightweight sessions: Choose AnyDesk if speed and low bandwidth performance are your top priorities.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Remote support · direct prompt · alternative
“If connection quality is poor: Choose AnyDesk for its superior performance on slow internet connections.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Remote support · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Consumer tools like TeamViewer, AnyDesk, or Chrome Remote Desktop present risks” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Remote support · negative prompt · hard negative
“Some users and IT experts recommend avoiding it for sensitive or business use.” Mistral Small · Remote support · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools to avoid or use extreme caution with: TeamViewer and AnyDesk” Grok 4.20 · Remote support · negative prompt · hard negative
“Often preferred by scammers due to its lightweight nature.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Remote support · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AnyDesk, over the 136 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AnyDesk was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 116 of the 136 answers that named AnyDesk and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
432 of the 432 domain citations in answers naming AnyDesk came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
anydesk.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AnyDesk takes 0% of first choices and Splashtop Remote Support takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 165,000 a month (“anydesk”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2,090 a month
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 136 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 116 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as AnyDesk
Follow AnyDesk
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AnyDesk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AnyDesk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AnyDesk by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where AnyDesk is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name AnyDesk, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.