AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › RemotePC · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

RemotePC

31Judge labels
6First choices
1Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Remote support for mid-market buyers
Rank 6 of 77 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of RemotePC →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In remote support · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named RemotePC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Remote support and remote accessIT operations and endpoint5%6 of 778%13accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for RemotePC yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated RemotePC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01012
Grok 4.1 Fast02002
Mistral Small02002
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.510102
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels3
Paraphrase9 labels1
Comparative2 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels2
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for budget-conscious teams: RemotePC starts at $1.84 per month with cross-device access and file transfer.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Remote support · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend RemotePC or Splashtop as they offer the best balance of security, features, and pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · Remote support · direct prompt · first choice
“would be Zoho Assist, RemotePC, or TeamViewer” Llama 4 Maverick · Remote support · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Other affordable options include TeamViewer, RemotePC, and Splashtop Remote Access” Mistral Small · Remote support · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“ScreenMeet says it lacks enterprise features such as centralized management, audit capabilities, and advanced troubleshooting tools.” Perplexity Sonar · Remote support · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as RemotePC, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RemotePC was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
AnyDesk18 of 311Not among the top eight
RustDesk5 of 310Not among the top eight
HelpWire3 of 310Not among the top eight
LogMeIn Rescue3 of 310Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RemotePC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 31 answers that named RemotePC and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com16
learn.g2.com16
teamviewer.com16
guideflow.com15
dnsstuff.com12
getapp.com12
zoho.com12
asianetnews.com9
businessnewsdaily.com8
channelinsider.com8

No domain is on file for RemotePC, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where RemotePC stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
27,100 a month (“remotepc”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
263 a month
Its own site
No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
5%
rank 6 of 77 in remote support
Segment leader
23%
Splashtop Remote Support
First choices
6 across its categories
Named in
31 answers
Its own site cited
No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as RemotePC

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as RemotePC; a claim can dispute any of them.
Splashtop/RemotePC 1

Follow RemotePC

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RemotePC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RemotePC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for RemotePC by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where RemotePC is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name RemotePC, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.