IT AI Index

Index › Products › Alloy · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Alloy

10Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Alloy was named 2 times in Identity verification, where Persona led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business23 of 58

under the label threshold

Mid-market23 of 61

under the label threshold

Enterprise23 of 76

under the label threshold

In identity verification · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Alloy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Identity verification	Identity and access	0%	23 of 61	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Persona at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Alloy yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Alloy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want a single hub that allows you to swap and cascade multiple vendors as you scale, integrate Alloy.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Identity verification · comparative prompt · alternative

“Alloy is worth evaluating if you're a fintech or another regulated business” GPT-6 Luna · Identity verification · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Alloy, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Alloy was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Persona7 of 103Not among the top eight

Trulioo5 of 101Not among the top eight

Sumsub5 of 100Not among the top eight

Middesk4 of 101Not among the top eight

Socure3 of 101Not among the top eight

Jumio3 of 100Not among the top eight

Veriff3 of 100Not among the top eight

Grafana Cloud2 of 101Not among the top eight

SigNoz2 of 100Not among the top eight

Cribl Stream1 of 101Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Alloy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 10 answers that named Alloy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

signzy.com4

azakaw.com3

grafana.com3

alloy.comYour site2

au10tix.com2

checktiv.com2

clearstaq.com2

cribl.io2

gbg.com2

identity.clearme.com2

Twenty-two of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Alloy came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

au10tix.com/blog/best-10-customer-identity-verification-software-providers2

checktiv.com/blog/best-identity-verification-software-in-20262

gbg.com/en-us/blog/best-kyc-providers2

identity.clearme.com/post/best-kyc-software2

microblink.com/resources/blog/top-kyc-solution-providers2

ondato.com/blog/best-identity-verification-software2

reddit.com/r/ProductManagement/comments/1rzwwor/what_is_the_best_identity_verification_sof2

regulaforensics.com/blog/top-identity-verification-companies2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

alloy.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Alloy takes 0% of first choices and Persona takes 21%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “identity verification service”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “identity verification services”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 74,000 a month (“alloy”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 30,445 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 8,790 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,758 · 146 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 6,349
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

18 ads · 18 text · 11 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2024, as Alloy, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 8 in the year, 10 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 23 of 61 in identity verification

Segment leader

21%

Persona

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 10 answers
Its own site cited: in 9 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on alloy.com

1,373

subdomains included

Content

958

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

25 · 54

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	514	26	2026-10-01
News or press	124	4	2026-09-03
Conference or event	122	2	2026-09-18
Webinar or virtual event	76	3	2026-09-14
Report or ebook	66	0	2026-04-21
Case study	32	0	2026-05-18
Glossary or explainer	14	0	2025-11-05
Comparison	10	0	2023-03-08

Most recent

2026-10-01Product updates september 2026 blog
2026-10-01Product updates september 2026 blog
2026-09-29What sets alloy apart blog
2026-09-29What sets alloy apart blog
2026-09-21Money2020 2026 breakfast ty blog
2026-09-21Money2020 2026 breakfast ty 2 blog

Events in person

Last twelve months

reported September 2026Alloy Summit 2026Chicago, United States · hosted
September 15, 2026 to September 16, 2026Datos Financial Crime & Cybersecurity ForumCharlotte · exhibited
September 3, 2026Alloy Summit 2026Chicago, United States · hosted
September 2, 2026Alloy Summit 2026Chicago, United States · hosted

As the event pages on alloy.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page alloy.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Alloy

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Alloy is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI-powered identity and fraud prevention platform that accelerates onboarding, stops fraud, and simplifies compliance across the customer lifecycle.
alloy.com
For: Banks, credit unions, fintechs, sponsor banks, crypto, and data & channel partners.
alloy.com
Integrations claimed: 270 alloy.com
Certifications: SOC 2ISO 27001:2022
Hosting: USUnited Kingdom
Customers named: LangleyIncrediblebankSuncoast Credit UnionConsumers CUEarnestLiveOakBrexRamp
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial

What Alloy's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: alloy.com, trust.alloy.com, alloy.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Alloy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Alloy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Alloy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Alloy is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Alloy, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.