One category · what the models named insteadAlternatives to Acunetix, as AI models named them
In the October 2026 Edition, 187 of the 252 answers collected in the one category where Acunetix holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.
Dynamic application security testing
Fifty-three of the eighty-four answers did not name Acunetix; it was the first choice in six. The first choices in those fifty-three answers, eight products in all:
Sixty of the eighty-four answers did not name Acunetix; it was the first choice in six. The first choices in those sixty answers, ten products in all, the eight most named:
Seventy-four of the eighty-four answers did not name Acunetix; it was the first choice in two. The first choices in those seventy-four answers, thirteen products in all, the eight most named:
How to read this
A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled Acunetix neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named Acunetix only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from Acunetix's side.
Every answer and every label behind these figures is in the record, sent on request. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of Acunetix was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.