OT and IoT security for small business buyers
Asked as “OT security platform”, and as “industrial and IoT device security tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 45 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
40%
Contested · Acreto 9%
40Microsoft Defender for IoT09Acreto07Fortinet OT Security Platform44others
40% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Armis CentrixMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Tenable OT SecurityMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Dragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto NetworksClaroty xDome vs Nozomi Networks GuardianClaroty xDome vs Fortinet OT Security PlatformClaroty xDome vs Armis CentrixClaroty xDome vs Tenable OT SecurityClaroty xDome vs Dragos PlatformClaroty xDome vs Palo Alto NetworksNozomi Networks Guardian vs Fortinet OT Security PlatformNozomi Networks Guardian vs Armis CentrixNozomi Networks Guardian vs Tenable OT SecurityNozomi Networks Guardian vs Dragos PlatformNozomi Networks Guardian vs Palo Alto NetworksFortinet OT Security Platform vs Armis CentrixFortinet OT Security Platform vs Tenable OT SecurityFortinet OT Security Platform vs Dragos PlatformFortinet OT Security Platform vs Palo Alto NetworksArmis Centrix vs Tenable OT SecurityArmis Centrix vs Dragos PlatformArmis Centrix vs Palo Alto NetworksTenable OT Security vs Dragos PlatformTenable OT Security vs Palo Alto NetworksDragos Platform vs Palo Alto Networks
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
M01
02
03
04
05
06
07A08
09Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Microsoft Defender for IoT40%
02Fortinet OT Security Platform7%
Fortinet OT Security Platform7%03Tenable OT Security4%
Tenable OT Security4%04Claroty xDome4%
Claroty xDome4%05Armis Centrix2%
Armis Centrix2%06Nozomi Networks Guardian2%
Nozomi Networks Guardian2%07Dragos Platform2%
Dragos Platform2%08AWS IoT Device Defender0%
09Forescout Vistaro Platform0%
Forescout Vistaro Platform0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Dragos Platform51%
19 of 37 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-heavy like Dragos or Claroty initially (quote-based, often $10k+ starting, six figures for full).” Grok 4.1 Fast, direct prompt
Claroty xDome38%
18 of 47 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid for Small B2B (Unless Budget Allows) | Claroty | ~$150,000 | Enterprise-focused, expensive per-asset licensing” Kimi K2, direct prompt
Nozomi Networks Guardian38%
15 of 39 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Caution: High upfront costs (sensors/appliances), complex configuration, and resource-intensive management.” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Microsoft Defender for IoT
15%
7 of 46 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Noted as "very expensive" for small businesses in user reviews, with licensing scaling poorly for low device counts.” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1063 links across 234 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
vendor site · FitGap41 answers · 72 citations · 11 models
vendor site · SourceForge38 answers · 79 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G238 answers · 57 citations · 11 models
30 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
vendor site · NetWitness28 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
25 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
24 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow18 answers · 19 citations · 11 models
18 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Fortinet17 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Microsoft17 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
34 answers · 10 models
27 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best ot security platform”, “ot and iot security platforms”, “ot security platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Defender for IoT 40% | 40% | 133 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | |||
| Acreto acreto.io | 9% | 17 | 90 | 0 | 4 | ||
| Fortinet parent site Fortinet OT Security Platform 7%, Fortinet Security Fabric 2% | 9% | 66 | 49,500 | 2,339 | |||
| Tenable parent site Tenable OT Security 4% | 4% | 62 | 27,100 | 1,194 | |||
| Claroty xDome claroty.com | 4% | 159 | 170 | 3 | 4,901 | 14 | |
| MetaDefender OT Access | 4% | ||||||
| Armis Centrix armis.com | 2% | 104 | 170 | 2 | 197,925 | $2,192 | 12 |
| Nozomi Networks Guardian nozominetworks.com | 2% | 133 | 20 | 0 | 3,643 | 25 | |
| Malcolm malcolm.fyi | 2% | 5 | |||||
| Paessler PRTG paessler.com | 2% | 80 | 390 | 14 | 107,237 | $12,945 | 120 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (fortinet.com, g2.com, netwitness.com, networkintelligence.ai). The first result for “best ot security platform” is fortinet.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best OT security platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which industrial and IoT device security tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top OT and IoT security platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best OT security platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a OT security platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which OT and IoT security platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Fortinet Security Fabricno first choiceChangedNozomi Networks GuardianMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platformno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Cisco Cyber Vision, Forescout Vistaro Platform, SectrioFour alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoTOne alternative
Seceon Open Threat Management (OTM) PlatformGPT-5.4 miniDragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTChangedArmis Centrix, Microsoft Defender for IoTFortinet OT Security Platformagainst: Claroty xDomeno first choiceagainst: Claroty xDome, Domotz, ORDR AI Protect Platform, Tenable OT Security
One alternative
Fortinet OT Security PlatformOne alternative
AWS IoT Device DefenderThree alternatives
Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianOne alternative
Nozomi Networks GuardianGemini 3.5 FlashFortinet OT Security Platformagainst: Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianFinite State, Microsoft Defender for IoTChangedMicrosoft Defender for IoTFortinet OT Security Platformagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Cisco, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks
Four alternatives
Claroty xDome, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Tenable OT Security, runZeroTwo alternatives
Claroty xDome, Karamba SecurityThree alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianTwo alternatives
Malcolm, TXOne NetworksFour alternatives
Claroty xDome, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto NetworksPerplexity SonarMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianClaroty xDomeChangedMicrosoft Defender for IoTAcretono first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Check Point IoT Security, Cisco Cyber Vision, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Fortinet IoT Security, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Three alternatives
Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Fortinet OT Security PlatformOne alternative
Perimeter81Four alternatives
Armis Centrix, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security, PortnoxTwo alternatives
Darktrace, Fortinet OT Security PlatformGrok 4.1 FastMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTHeldagainst: Forescout Vistaro Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Nozomi GuardianAcretoagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomino first choiceagainst: Darktrace, Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security
Two alternatives
Acreto, Fortinet OT Security PlatformOne alternative
Cisco Cyber VisionFour alternatives
AWS IoT Device Defender, Check Point Harmony IoT / Quantum IoT Protect, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Palo Alto Networks IoT SecurityTwo alternatives
BlastShield, MetaDefender OT AccessMistral SmallMetaDefender OT Access, Tenable OT SecurityClaroty xDomeChangedForescout Vistaro Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Defender for IoTno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Cisco Cyber VisionTwo alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Palo Alto NetworksDeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Dragos PlatformSternum IoTChangedagainst: Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Armis Centrix, Dragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security
Two alternatives
Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianThree alternatives
Check Point IoT Protect, Microsoft Defender for IoT, TXOne NetworksThree alternatives
Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT SecurityThree alternatives
Acreto, Dispel, Tenable OT SecurityLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceArmis CentrixChangedno first choiceAcretono first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Forescout Vistaro Platform, Google Cloud, Microsoft Defender for IoT, The Claroty PlatformQwen 3.7 FlashTenable OT Securityagainst: Dragos PlatformSnyk, SonarQubeChangedagainst: Tenable Nessus, Tenable OT SecurityArmis Centrix, Microsoft Defender for IoTPaessler PRTGagainst: Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Fortinet Security Fabric, ManageEngine OpUtils, Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessFive alternatives
AWS IoT Device Defender, Microsoft Azure IoT, OpenVAS, Sigstore, Tenable NessusTwo alternatives
Nozomi Networks Guardian, SectrioFour alternatives
Keykey Systems, ManageEngine OpManager, Nmap, WiresharkKimi K2Microsoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianMicrosoft Defender for IoTHeldagainst: Armis CentrixMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Dragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks IoT/OTno first choiceagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security
Two alternatives
Armis Centrix, Tenable OT SecurityTwo alternatives
Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianThree alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Tenable OT SecurityThree alternatives
Acreto, Dispel, OT Cyber Direct MarketplaceGLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Defender for IoTMicrosoft Defender for IoTHeldDragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTno first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Microsoft Defender for IoT
Five alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianOne alternative
Armis CentrixNine alternatives
AWS IoT Device Defender, Acreto, Azure IoT Security, Cisco Secure IoT, Claroty xDome, Forcepoint, Fortinet IoT Security, Google Cloud IoT Security, Nozomi Networks GuardianSix alternatives
Endian SMB Solutions, Malcolm, OpenVAS, Suricata, Wazuh, ZeekMiniMax M2.5MetaDefender OT Access, Nozomi Networks GuardianMicrosoft Defender for IoTChangedMicrosoft Defender for IoTAcreto OT Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloudno first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security
Three alternatives
Claroty xDome, Perimeter81, Tenable OT SecurityTwo alternatives
Claroty xDome, Dragos PlatformOne alternative
Tenable OT SecurityGPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Defender for IoTMalcolmChangedArmis Centrix for OT/IoT, Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks VantageMicrosoft Defender for IoTno first choiceagainst: AWS IoT Device Defender, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Three alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianOne alternative
FortiNACTwo alternatives
Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoTOne alternative
MalcolmMuse Glimmer 30BAcretoagainst: Cisco Cyber Vision, Tenable OT SecurityAllot IoTSecure / IoTSecure PlatformChangedMicrosoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardianagainst: Claroty xDomeMicrosoft Defender for IoT, Tosi Platformno first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks Industrial OT Security, Tenable OT Security
Two alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Network Perception NP-ViewOne alternative
AWS IoT Device DefenderOne alternative
Armis CentrixOne alternative
DispelBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:02 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:19 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:36 | yes | 16 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:44 | yes | 17 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:32 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:45 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:50 | yes | 21 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:07 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:27 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:18 | yes | 24 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:37 | yes | 20 | 94 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:24 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:25 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:27 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:45 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:05 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:44 | yes | 6 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:53 | yes | 15 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:55 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:14 | yes | 23 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:47 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:28 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:21 | yes | 17 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:24 | yes | 23 | 56 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:27 | yes | 13 | 99 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:44 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:01 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:35 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:08 | yes | 6 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:20 | yes | 9 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:23 | yes | 14 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:54 | yes | 20 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:56 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:56 | yes | 22 | 46 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 23:50 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:41 | yes | 5 | 40 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:06 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:34 | yes | 15 | 64 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:44 | yes | 20 | 48 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:20 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:25 | yes | 19 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:25 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 22:22 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:52 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:00 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:40 | yes | 21 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:55 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:59 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:58 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:24 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:10 | yes | 25 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:06 | yes | 25 | 66 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:25 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:00 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:13 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:49 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:41 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:11 | yes | 15 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:40 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 22:47 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:30 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:43 | yes | 20 | 48 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:04 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:02 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 02:00 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:28 | yes | 17 | 63 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:27 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:36 | yes | 2 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:47 | yes | 11 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:31 | yes | 34 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:52 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 23:30 | yes | 21 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:57 | yes | 15 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:40 | yes | 21 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:28 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 22:33 | yes | 21 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:37 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:08 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:27 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:41 | yes | 23 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:32 | yes | 11 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:39 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:38 | yes | 21 | 35 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Armis read as Armis Centrix
Armis (Armis Centrix) read as Armis Centrix
Armis (Centrix for OT/IoT) read as Armis Centrix
Armis (specifically **Armis Centrix**) read as Armis Centrix
Claroty read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (specifically **Claroty xDome**) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (xCPS / CTD) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (xDome / CTD) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (xDome) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (xDome/Continuous Threat Detection) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty Platform read as Claroty xDome
Dragos read as Dragos Platform
Dragos (Dragos Platform) read as Dragos Platform
Forescout read as Forescout Vistaro Platform
Forescout (EnterpriseView + OT modules) read as Forescout Vistaro Platform
Forescout (Vistaro/eyeSight) read as Forescout Vistaro Platform
Forescout Platform read as Forescout Vistaro Platform
Fortinet read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Fortinet (FortiGate Rugged + FortiGuard OT Security) read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Fortinet (FortiGate Rugged + OT Security Service) read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Fortinet (FortiGate, FortiNAC) read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Nozomi Networks read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Guardian/Vantage) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Vantage + Guardian Sensors) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Vantage + Guardian) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (specifically **Nozomi Vantage**) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks Platform read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Palo Alto read as Palo Alto Networks
Palo Alto (OT modules) read as Palo Alto Networks
Tenable OT read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable.ot read as Tenable OT Security
Unresolved, counted raw
Acreto OT Security
Allot IoTSecure / IoTSecure Platform
Armis Centrix for OT/IoT
Azure IoT Security
BastionZero
BlastShield (by BlastWave)
Check Point Harmony IoT / Quantum IoT Protect
Check Point IoT Protect
Cisco Secure IoT
Dragos OT-Watch
Endian SMB Solutions
Endian Secure Digital Platform
Google Cloud IoT Security
Karamba Security (VCode)
Keykey Systems
MITRE Caldera for OT
Microsoft Azure IoT
Network Perception
Network Perception NP-View
Nozomi Guardian
ORDR AI Protect Platform
OT Cyber Direct Marketplace
OTForge
PLCscan
Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT
Seceon Open Threat Management (OTM) Platform
Secomea
Sternum IoT
TOSIBOX
Tenable OT vulnerability management
Tosi Platform
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.