AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Armis Centrix · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Armis Centrix

106Judge labels
7First choices
20Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in OT/IoT security for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 107 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 13% of its 31 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Armis Centrix →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ot/iot security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Armis Centrix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
OT and IoT securitySecurity operations6%5 of 10713%31accepted challenger
Attack surface managementSecurity operations0%34 of 1000%1under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 49%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Armis Centrix yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Armis Centrix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510203
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash02013
Perplexity Sonar00112
Grok 4.2001113
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash02114
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash11002
Kimi K212003
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.511103
GPT-6 Luna02002
Muse Glimmer 30B02002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labels1
Paraphrase17 labels5
Comparative33 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained11 labels1
Negative23 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative106 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend Armis as the primary choice due to its balance of comprehensive device discovery, ease of implementation, and vendor compatibility” Claude Haiku 4.5 · OT/IoT security · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“You should only choose Agentless (passive monitoring) platforms like Claroty, Nozomi, or Armis for OT.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · OT/IoT security · negative prompt · first choice
“start with Claroty xDome or Armis” Kimi K2 · OT/IoT security · direct prompt · first choice
“Armis is a solid first choice” MiniMax M2.5 · OT/IoT security · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Example Platforms to approach with caution: Armis Centrix (or similar integration-heavy IT/IoT platforms)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · OT/IoT security · negative prompt · soft negative
“Strong on IoT/XIoT discovery but weaker on deep OT protocol knowledge vs. natives like Dragos/Nozomi.” Grok 4.20 · OT/IoT security · negative prompt · soft negative
“not the same as deep OT-native detection; they may be better suited to IoT visibility” Perplexity Sonar · OT/IoT security · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious with Armis for OT (not IoT)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · OT/IoT security · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Armis Centrix, over the 106 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Armis Centrix was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Forescout Vistaro Platform44 of 1061Not among the top eight
Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security10 of 1060Not among the top eight
AWS IoT Device Defender9 of 1060Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Armis Centrix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 104 of the 106 answers that named Armis Centrix and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

networkintelligence.ai60
netwitness.com42
g2.com41
elisity.com40
us.fitgap.com37
gartner.com36
opsiocloud.com36
peerspot.com32
sourceforge.net32
ciopages.com30

386 of the 386 domain citations in answers naming Armis Centrix came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

armis.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Armis Centrix takes 6% of first choices and Microsoft Defender for IoT takes 21%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ot security platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best ot security platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
170 a month (“armis centrix”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 197,925 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,893 · 164 in the top three
Sites linking to it
5,617
Paid Google search
4 searches its ads show for, about 26 clicks and $2,192 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
23 ads · 23 text · 12 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2026, as Just Media Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 23 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
6%
rank 5 of 107 in ot/iot security
Segment leader
21%
Microsoft Defender for IoT
First choices
7 across its categories
Named in
106 answers
Its own site cited
in 104 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on armis.com
116
subdomains included
Content
2
counted in the table below
Documentation
36
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Webinar or virtual event102026-04-15
Glossary or explainer1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page armis.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Armis Centrix

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Armis Centrix; a claim can dispute any of them.
Armis 26Armis (Armis Centrix) 1

Follow Armis Centrix

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Armis Centrix is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Certifications
C5CSA STAR Level 1Cyber EssentialsENSFedRAMP ModerateISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27001 SoAISO/IEC 27017:2015
Customers named
United AirlinesMain Line HealthGrand Canyon UniversityDocuSignColgate-PalmoliveUplightMondelēz InternationalFortive Corporation
Not stated on the pages read
Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Armis Centrix's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: armis.com, trust.armis.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Armis Centrix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Armis Centrix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Armis Centrix by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Armis Centrix is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Armis Centrix, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at armis.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.