Tenable · 1 category · RankedTenable OT Security
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT and IoT security | Security operations | 4% | 7 of 107 | 15% | 27 | accepted challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Tenable OT Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“frequently cited as a more budget-friendly option compared to some competitors... Start with a free trial or the most affordable commercial platform (like Tenable OT Security or Acreto)” Mistral Small · OT/IoT security · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value: Tenable OT Security (formerly Tenable.ot)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · OT/IoT security · budget prompt · first choice
“Tenable's Tenable One exposure management platform is a comprehensive attack surface management system covering endpoints, cloud environments, OT systems” Claude Haiku 4.5 · OT/IoT security · direct prompt · alternative
“Complement with vulnerability management such as Tenable OT Security if you need prioritized remediation.” Muse Glimmer 30B · OT/IoT security · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“These are IT-security vendors extending into OT. Their effectiveness depends on how well their OT findings integrate with your existing SOC” Mistral Small · OT/IoT security · negative prompt · soft negative
“these vendors risk falling behind peers regarding advanced AI-driven detection capabilities” Qwen 3.7 Flash · OT/IoT security · negative prompt · soft negative
“Tenable.ot has user complaints on asset classification accuracy and sensor bugs” Grok 4.1 Fast · OT/IoT security · negative prompt · soft negative
“often higher cost for full deploys (~thousands+ annually)” Grok 4.1 Fast · OT/IoT security · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Tenable OT Security, over the 72 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tenable OT Security was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 62 of the 72 answers that named Tenable OT Security and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
270 of the 270 domain citations in answers naming Tenable OT Security came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Tenable OT Security stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 110 a month (“tenable ot security”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Tenable's site (tenable.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 72 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 62 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Tenable OT Security
Follow Tenable OT Security
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Tenable is the company behind Tenable OT Security.ShowHide
The company
On record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Tenable One Exposure Management Platform
- For
- team di sicurezza OT / responsabili della sicurezza informatica
- Customers named
- City of RaleighUniversity of MiamiContinental AG
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Tenable OT Security's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: docs.tenable.com/OT-security.htm, it.tenable.com/products/ot-security, jp.tenable.com/data-sheets/tenable-ot, tenable.com/sc-dashboards/ics-asset-detection, tenable.com/solution-briefs/tenable-ot-security. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tenable OT Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tenable OT Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tenable OT Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Tenable OT Security is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Tenable OT Security, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.