AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › AWS IoT Device Defender · October 2026 Edition
AWS · 1 category · Ranked

AWS IoT Device Defender

20Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in OT/IoT security for small business buyers
Rank 31 of 107 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ot/iot security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named AWS IoT Device Defender for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
OT and IoT securitySecurity operations0%31 of 10720%5under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for IoT at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AWS IoT Device Defender yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AWS IoT Device Defender across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00112
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“AWS IoT Device Defender is a strong alternative” Mistral Small · OT/IoT security · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Cloud-only IoT focus; limited pure industrial/OT depth” Grok 4.1 Fast · OT/IoT security · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AWS IoT Device Defender, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AWS IoT Device Defender was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Microsoft Defender for IoT14 of 202Not among the top eight
Claroty xDome11 of 203Not among the top eight
Nozomi Networks Guardian11 of 203Not among the top eight
Dragos Platform10 of 202Not among the top eight
Armis Centrix9 of 201Not among the top eight
Fortinet OT Security Platform6 of 201Not among the top eight
Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security5 of 200Not among the top eight
Tenable OT Security5 of 200Not among the top eight
Forescout Vistaro Platform4 of 202Not among the top eight
Palo Alto Networks IoT Security4 of 200Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AWS IoT Device Defender. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 20 answers that named AWS IoT Device Defender and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

us.fitgap.com11
g2.com10
sourceforge.net10
thectoclub.com10
security.toolsinfo.com9
networkintelligence.ai8
guideflow.com7
holidaylandmark.com7
opsiocloud.com7
devopsschool.com6

Eighty-five of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming AWS IoT Device Defender came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where AWS IoT Device Defender stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
70 a month (“aws iot device defender”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Its own site
It sits on AWS's site (aws.amazon.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 31 of 107 in ot/iot security
Segment leader
21%
Microsoft Defender for IoT
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
20 answers
Its own site cited
in 19 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow AWS IoT Device Defender

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

AWS is the company behind AWS IoT Device Defender.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Security management across your IoT devices and fleets
For
organizations managing IoT devices and fleets
Price stated
Audit, Rules Detect or ML Detect independently, since they are each charged separately aws.amazon.com/iot-device-defender/faq
Free plan or trial
Yes. Visit the AWS IoT Device Defender pricing page for more information. aws.amazon.com/iot-device-defender/faq
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What AWS IoT Device Defender's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: aws.amazon.com/iot-device-defender, aws.amazon.com/iot-device-defender/faq, aws.amazon.com/iot-device-defender/sla, aws.amazon.com/iot-device-defender/pricing, aws.amazon.com/iot-device-defender/features. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AWS IoT Device Defender's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AWS IoT Device Defender, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AWS IoT Device Defender by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where AWS IoT Device Defender is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name AWS IoT Device Defender, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at aws.amazon.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.