AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Nozomi Networks Guardian · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Nozomi Networks Guardian

142Judge labels
18First choices
26Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
22% in OT/IoT security for enterprise buyers
Rank 3 of 107 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 13% of its 46 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Nozomi Networks Guardian →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In ot/iot security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Nozomi Networks Guardian for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
OT and IoT securitySecurity operations10%3 of 10713%46accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Nozomi Networks Guardian yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Nozomi Networks Guardian across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511103
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash13026
Perplexity Sonar00112
Grok 4.1 Fast22004
Mistral Small21104
DeepSeek V4 Flash03115
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash03104
Kimi K203115
GLM 4.7 FlashX01203
MiniMax M2.503104
GPT-6 Luna10001
Muse Glimmer 30B11013

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct30 labels8
Paraphrase21 labels7
Comparative34 labels8not counted in share
Budget-constrained19 labels2
Scale-constrained17 labels1
Negative21 labels5not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative142 labels in all, every segment counted; 18 of the 31 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Offers the broadest range of deployment form factors and has the most extensive OT and IoT device coverage by asset type count and the strongest scalability” Claude Haiku 4.5 · OT/IoT security · direct prompt · first choice
“Claroty and Nozomi are widely regarded as market leaders for broad asset visibility and risk posture.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · OT/IoT security · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Nozomi Networks (specifically their Guardian platform with Vantage SaaS management)” Grok 4.1 Fast · OT/IoT security · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Prioritize Gartner/PAC-evaluated natives (Claroty/Nozomi/Dragos) for critical infra.” Grok 4.1 Fast · OT/IoT security · negative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid if budget is tight: Nozomi Networks” Perplexity Sonar · OT/IoT security · budget prompt · hard negative
“The presence of recent high-severity privilege and authentication issues does not mean the product should be avoided outright, it means deployments must be kept current” Muse Glimmer 30B · OT/IoT security · negative prompt · soft negative
“frequently cost six figures and require dedicated Security Operations Center (SOC) teams—usually out of reach” Gemini 3.5 Flash · OT/IoT security · budget prompt · soft negative
“"don't overbuy for your scale." The platform is expensive and complex” DeepSeek V4 Flash · OT/IoT security · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Nozomi Networks Guardian, over the 142 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nozomi Networks Guardian was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Forescout Vistaro Platform43 of 1421Not among the top eight
Cisco Cyber Vision11 of 1421Not among the top eight
AWS IoT Device Defender11 of 1420Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nozomi Networks Guardian. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 133 of the 142 answers that named Nozomi Networks Guardian and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

networkintelligence.ai79
netwitness.com58
us.fitgap.com51
opsiocloud.com50
elisity.com49
g2.com48
gartner.com46
peerspot.com45
sourceforge.net45
fortinet.com42

513 of the 513 domain citations in answers naming Nozomi Networks Guardian came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

nozominetworks.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Nozomi Networks Guardian takes 10% of first choices and Microsoft Defender for IoT takes 21%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ot security platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best ot security platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
20 a month (“nozomi networks guardian”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 3,643 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,406 · 81 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,035
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
63 ads · 58 text, 4 image, 1 video · 25 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2022, as Nozomi Networks, Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 44 in the year, 19 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
10%
rank 3 of 107 in ot/iot security
Segment leader
21%
Microsoft Defender for IoT
First choices
18 across its categories
Named in
142 answers
Its own site cited
in 133 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on nozominetworks.com
3,638
subdomains included
Content
1,691
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
113 · 1,174
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog1,37012026-07-28OT/IoT security, Firewalls
News or press21502023-09-21OT/IoT security, MDR
Case study23undated
Webinar or virtual event22undated
Conference or event22undated
Report or ebook16undated
Glossary or explainer13undated
Comparison9undated
Podcast or video112026-07-29

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on nozominetworks.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page nozominetworks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Nozomi Networks Guardian

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Nozomi Networks Guardian; a claim can dispute any of them.
Nozomi Networks 39Nozomi Networks (Guardian + Vantage) 1Nozomi Networks (Guardian) 1Nozomi Networks (Vantage) 1Nozomi Networks (with Vantage) 1Nozomi Networks Guardian / CMC 1Nozomi Networks Platform 1

Follow Nozomi Networks Guardian

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Nozomi Networks Guardian is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Guardian\ \ Network
Customers named
COPT DefensePrairie’s Edge Casino ResortThe Valencian Health DepartmentKonkuk University HospitalDEWAKeysightNational Gas DistributorTop Five Global Airport
Not stated on the pages read
Who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Nozomi Networks Guardian's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: nozominetworks.com, nozominetworks.com/compliance/nerc-cip, nozominetworks.com/platform, nozominetworks.com/case-studies, nozominetworks.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nozomi Networks Guardian's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nozomi Networks Guardian, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Nozomi Networks Guardian by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Nozomi Networks Guardian is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Nozomi Networks Guardian, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at nozominetworks.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Nozomi Networks Guardian is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Nozomi Networks Guardian is among the products AI models recommend first in OT and IoT security this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in OT and IoT security, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/ot-and-iot-security/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/nozomi-networks-guardian--ot-and-iot-security-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in OT and IoT security, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the OT and IoT security standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in OT and IoT security, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/ot-and-iot-security/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/nozomi-networks-guardian--ot-and-iot-security-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in OT and IoT security, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the OT and IoT security standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in OT and IoT security, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/ot-and-iot-security/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/nozomi-networks-guardian--ot-and-iot-security-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in OT and IoT security, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the OT and IoT security standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.