1 category · RankedDragos Platform
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT and IoT security | Security operations | 2% | 9 of 107 | 26% | 46 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Dragos Platform across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For OT threat intelligence depth → Dragos (especially if you want the best intelligence subscription and IR expertise)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · OT/IoT security · comparative prompt · first choice
“Recognized as a leader for its robust OT-specific threat detection, asset visibility, and risk management.” Mistral Small · OT/IoT security · direct prompt · first choice
“consider platforms purpose-built for industrial environments, such as Dragos, Nozomi Networks, or Claroty” Mistral Small · OT/IoT security · negative prompt · first choice
“Prioritize Gartner/PAC-evaluated natives (Claroty/Nozomi/Dragos) for critical infra.” Grok 4.1 Fast · OT/IoT security · negative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to Avoid (for Mid-Market) ... Premium pricing (~$100K+/year for single site) and complex deployments.” Kimi K2 · OT/IoT security · direct prompt · hard negative
“What to avoid on a tight budget: Claroty, Nozomi Networks, and Dragos” DeepSeek V4 Flash · OT/IoT security · budget prompt · hard negative
“Dragos is excellent but tends to lean toward highly complex, utility-grade environments with threat intelligence-heavy requirements.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · OT/IoT security · scale prompt · soft negative
“their premium pricing and deployment complexity limit accessibility for mid-tier or resource-constrained organizations” Muse Glimmer 30B · OT/IoT security · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Dragos Platform, over the 136 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dragos Platform was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 128 of the 136 answers that named Dragos Platform and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
519 of the 519 domain citations in answers naming Dragos Platform came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
dragos.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Dragos Platform takes 2% of first choices and Microsoft Defender for IoT takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 70 a month (“dragos platform”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 9,960 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 9,894 · 123 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,112
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 7 across its categories
- Named in
- 136 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 128 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 402 | 21 | 2026-10-01 | BAS, XDR | |
| News or press | 82 | 2 | 2026-09-21 | SIEM, Cyber risk quant | |
| Report or ebook | 9 | 3 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | 0 | 2025-08-20 | ||
| Conference or event | 6 | 0 | 2024-09-23 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2024-10-21 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2019-11-13 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2026-06-24 | ||
| Case study | 1 | 0 | 2025-08-20 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-01Mtsa device security blog
- 2026-09-30Xot software supply chain security blog
- 2026-09-28Dragos appliance datasheet report or ebook
- 2026-09-24Vl prosperity mtsa maritime cybersecurity blog
- 2026-09-23Xot visibility beyond asset inventory blog
- 2026-09-21Dragos acquires netrise and runzero news or press
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page dragos.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Names read as Dragos Platform
Follow Dragos Platform
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Dragos Platform is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- xOT-Expertise Codified
- For
- critical infrastructure operations
- Free plan or trial
- free demo dragos.com/partners
- Customers named
- Littleton Electric Light & Water Department (LELWD)OUCKoch IndustriesTrinity River Authority of TexasThe Boston Beer Company
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Dragos Platform's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: dragos.com, dragos.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dragos Platform's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dragos Platform, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Dragos Platform by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Dragos Platform is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Dragos Platform, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.