AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Security operations › October 2026 Edition

Communications archiving and compliance

Asked as “communications archiving platform”, and as “email and chat archiving for compliance”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 60 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
20%
Contested · Mimecast Cloud Archive 17%
20Smarsh Enterprise Archive17Mimecast Cloud Archive08Google Vault55others

20% of first choices, contested.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Smarsh Enterprise Archive20%21%53accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 20% now.
02Mimecast Cloud Archive17%11%36accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 17% now.
03Microsoft Purview8%16%25accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 8% now.
04Google Vault Lab in the set8%18%17accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 8% now.
05Jatheon7%0%20accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 7% now.
06MailStore Server7%0%13accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 7% now.
07Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service7%6%17accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 7% now.
08Proofpoint Enterprise Archive5%5%39accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 5% now.
09Global Relay3%12%32accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 3% now.
10Intradyn2%0%10accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Veritas Enterprise Vault0%38%13criticized challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
11Theta Lake0%0%10accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Vault is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice one time of 4; the other thirteen models four times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Smarsh Enterprise Archive20%
02Mimecast Cloud Archive17%
03Microsoft Purview8%
04Google Vault8%
05Jatheon7%
06MailStore Server7%
07Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service7%
08Proofpoint Enterprise Archive5%
09Global Relay3%
10Intradyn2%
11Theta Lake0%
12Veritas Enterprise Vault0%

What they warned about

Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Smarsh Enterprise Archive
21%
11 of 53 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“complex, often vague pricing, unavailability of certain functions, slow search performance, and lack of robust technical support and documentation” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Veritas Enterprise Vault
38%
5 of 13 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“This is one of the most frequently flagged platforms in my research... The platforms listed above (especially **Veritas Enterprise Vault**) are the ones most frequently flagged in my research as having meaningful, persistent concerns” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Microsoft Purview
16%
4 of 25 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“Cons: These tools operate in silos... Microsoft Purview requires expensive third-party connectors to archive SMS or WhatsApp.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt
Mimecast Cloud Archive
11%
4 of 36 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“**Include Mimecast in the shortlist.** Its archive product covers email and collaboration data, but check that its capture and review capabilities match your actual channels” GPT-6 Luna, paraphrase prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1102 links across 206 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.

vendor site · Jatheon59 answers · 86 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Archon Data Store36 answers · 43 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Smarsh31 answers · 51 citations · 11 models
31 answers · 40 citations · 12 models
30 answers · 38 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G227 answers · 51 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Wordwatch23 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ZipDo.co19 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SourceForge15 answers · 18 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best communications archiving platform”, “communications archiving platform”, “communications archiving platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsGoogle ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Smarsh Enterprise Archive smarsh.com20%14810013,26277
Mimecast mimecast.com
Mimecast Cloud Archive 17%
17%88300148,929 company215
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Purview 8%, Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving 3%, Microsoft 365 2%
13%4382,240,000403,136
Google Cloud google.dev
Google Vault 8%
8%60165,0007,596881,346109
MailStore Home mailstore.com
MailStore Server 7%, MailStore Home 2%
8%4750110,12591
Jatheon jatheon.com7%72170011,7624
Barracuda parent site
Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service 7%
7%45201,00010,561
Proofpoint parent site
Proofpoint Enterprise Archive 5%
5%12027,1001,488
Global Relay globalrelay.com3%946,6008921,1003
Intradyn intradyn.com2%2017008,7510

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (jatheon.com). The first result for “best communications archiving platform” is comply.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best communications archiving platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which email and chat archiving for compliance would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top communications archiving platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best communications archiving platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a communications archiving platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which communications archiving platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Mimecast Cloud Archive, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Three alternativesArcserve UDP Archiving, ComplyKEY MailMeter, MailStore Server
TitanHQ Email ArchivingChanged
Four alternativesBarracuda Cloud Archiving Service, Intradyn, MailStore Server, Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving
no first choice
Five alternativesGlobal Relay, MailStore Server, Microsoft Purview, Mimecast Cloud Archive, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
ShareArchiver
Four alternativesGoogle Vault, Intradyn, MailStore Server, Microsoft 365
no first choiceagainst: Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Roundcube, WeChat, WhatsApp
GPT-5.4 miniSmarsh Enterprise Archive
Four alternativesArchive360, Microsoft Purview, Mimecast Cloud Archive, Theta Lake
Microsoft PurviewChanged
Two alternativesProofpoint Enterprise Archive, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Global Relay, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
One alternativeMicrosoft Purview
Microsoft 365 Archive / Exchange Online Archiving
Four alternativesGoogle Vault, N-able Mail Assure, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, Smarsh SMB offerings
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashMimecast Cloud Archive
Three alternativesBarracuda Cloud Archiving Service, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, Theta Lake
against: Global Relay, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
JatheonChanged
Three alternativesMimecast Cloud Archive, MirrorWeb, Theta Lake
against: Google Vault, Microsoft Purview, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Global Relay, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Four alternativesArchive360, Arctera Enterprise Vault, Microsoft Purview, Theta Lake
Google Vault, Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving
Four alternativesDropsuite Archiving, Intradyn, MailStore Server / MailStore Cloud, Mailpiler
against: Global Relay, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Mimecast Cloud Archive, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Six alternativesGlobal Relay, Google Vault, Jatheon, Microsoft Purview, Smarsh Enterprise Archive, Vaultastic
against: Micro Focus Digital Safe, Mimecast Cloud Archive, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, Smarsh Enterprise Archive, Veritas Enterprise Vault
Perplexity SonarSmarsh Enterprise Archive
Three alternativesGlobal Relay, Mimecast Archiving, Wordwatch
Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, Smarsh Enterprise ArchiveChanged
One alternativeArchive360
no first choiceMicrosoft Purview
One alternativeBarracuda Cloud Archiving Service
no first choiceagainst: Google Vault, Microsoft 365 retention, Slack’s native archive
Grok 4.1 FastSmarsh Enterprise Archive
Two alternativesGlobal Relay, Jatheon
Smarsh Enterprise ArchiveHeld
Three alternativesJatheon, Mimecast Cloud Archive, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
against: Outlook
Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Five alternativesArctera, Global Relay, Jatheon, Smarsh Enterprise Archive, Theta Lake
Google Vault
Four alternativesComma Compliance, MailStore Server, Sharp Archive, Zoho Mail Archiving
Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Five alternativesGlobal Relay, Jatheon, Mimecast Cloud Archive, OpenText, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
against: Smarsh Enterprise Archive, Veritas Enterprise Vault
Mistral SmallMimecast Cloud Archive, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Two alternativesMicrosoft Purview, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Intradyn, Smarsh Enterprise ArchiveChanged
Two alternativesComply, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Four alternativesBarracuda Message Archiver, Jatheon, Microsoft Purview, Pagefreezer
Google Vault
Two alternativesArchive Intel, M-Files
no first choiceagainst: Mimecast Cloud Archive, Smarsh Enterprise Archive, Veritas Enterprise Vault
DeepSeek V4 FlashJatheon
Two alternativesMimecast Cloud Archive, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
against: Smarsh Enterprise Archive
JatheonHeld
Two alternativesBarracuda Cloud Archiving Service, Mimecast Cloud Archive
against: Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Five alternativesGlobal Relay, Jatheon, Mimecast Cloud Archive, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, Veritas Enterprise Vault
against: Microsoft Purview
Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service, Microsoft Purview
Four alternativesComplyKEY MailMeter, Google Vault, Libraesva Email Archiver, MailStore Server
no first choiceagainst: Archive360, Bloomberg Vault, Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving, Veritas Enterprise Vault
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceArchive360, Smarsh Enterprise ArchiveChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashMimecast Cloud Archive, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Four alternativesGlobal Relay, OpenText, Smarsh Enterprise Archive, Wordwatch
Mimecast Cloud ArchiveChanged
Three alternativesBarracuda Messaging Archive, Jatheon, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Microsoft Purview, OpenText Core Business Communication Archive
Three alternativesIBM Guardium, Mimecast Cloud Archive, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
MailArchiva
One alternativeMailStore Server
against: MailsDaddy Free Email Archiver
no first choiceagainst: Druva
Kimi K2Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service, MailStore Server
Three alternativesJatheon, Mimecast Cloud Archive, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Jatheon, Mimecast Cloud ArchiveChanged
One alternativeMicrosoft Purview
against: Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Six alternativesArchive Intel, Global Relay, Hadrius, Jatheon, Mimecast Cloud Archive, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
against: Google Vault, Microsoft Purview
MailStore Server
Three alternativesBarracuda Cloud Archiving Service, Google Vault, Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving
no first choiceagainst: Aesto, LLC, Barracuda Email Protection, Global Relay, Iron Mountain, Smarsh Enterprise Archive, Veritas Enterprise Vault
GLM 4.7 FlashXGlobal Relay, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Three alternativesMimecast Cloud Archive, Theta Lake, Wordwatch
Microsoft PurviewChanged
Three alternativesJatheon, OpenText Core Business Communication Archive, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Three alternativesACA Group, Global Relay Archive, Veritas Enterprise Vault
MailStore Home
Five alternativesBarracuda Message Archiver, Comma, Google Vault, Microsoft Purview, Preservica
no first choiceagainst: Global Relay, SteelEye
MiniMax M2.5Global Relay, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Three alternativesMimecast Cloud Archive, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, Theta Lake
Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving, Mimecast Cloud ArchiveChanged
Three alternativesJatheon, MailStore Server, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Five alternativesBarracuda Cloud Archiving Service, Global Relay, Google Vault, Microsoft Purview, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Google Vault, MailStore Server
One alternativeMicrosoft Exchange Online Archiving
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaMimecast Cloud Archive
Four alternativesGlobal Relay, Microsoft Purview, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Google Vault, Microsoft PurviewChanged
Two alternativesGlobal Relay, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
against: Mimecast Cloud Archive
Global Relay, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Four alternativesArchive360, Arctera, Mimecast Cloud Archive, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
against: Microsoft Purview
Microsoft 365
One alternativeGoogle Workspace
against: Smarsh Enterprise Archive
no first choiceagainst: Smarsh Enterprise Archive, TeleMessage
Muse Glimmer 30BBarracuda Archiving Service / Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service
Four alternativesGlobal Relay, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, Smarsh Enterprise Archive, Wordwatch
Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service, Mimecast Cloud ArchiveChanged
Five alternativesCyberSentriq Email Archiving, Global Relay Archive, Jatheon, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, Smarsh Enterprise Archive
against: Microsoft 365
Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Three alternativesGlobal Relay, Microsoft Purview, Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service, MailStore Server
One alternativeOpen Archiver Enterprise
no first choiceagainst: Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service, Mimecast Cloud Archive
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 01:49yes98 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 22:46yes56 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 00:55yes2227 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 01:05yes193 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 00:39yes2111 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 22:46yes127 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:45yes2033 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 01:42yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 23:37yes931 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 01:42yes1543 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 00:05yes2187 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 00:53yes919 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 00:34yes315 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 01:29yes2224 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 01:49yes1710 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:34yes36 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 01:03yes2228 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:42yes205 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 22:48yes2211 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 23:50yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 01:39yes2137 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 01:22yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 01:25yes933 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 23:04yes1415 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 00:08yes2281 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 22:50yes747 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 00:34yes421 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 01:14yes1224 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 01:23yes910 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:32yes48 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 01:48yes2031 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:55yes194 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 00:14yes2012 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 00:45yes88 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:27yes1990 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 00:00yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 00:25yes1021 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 01:43yes1637 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 23:12yes2260 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:31yes2272 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 01:56yes936 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:45yes1136 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 00:51yes96 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 01:09yes45 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 23:54yes1623 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:55yes202 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 00:19yes239 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 00:52yes53 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 22:14yes2338 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 22:28yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 23:44yes1942 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 00:15yes1725 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 23:09yes1538 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:37yes1025 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 23:47yes318 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 22:40yes2431 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 23:07no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 01:35no08 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 00:40yes1025 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 23:19yes205 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 01:29yes1812 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 01:28no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 01:52yes1833 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 00:54yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 22:16no027 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 00:44yes2330 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 00:04yes1339 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:46yes516 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 01:06yes319 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 01:06yes1329 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 22:41yes198 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:00yes27 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 23:36yes2324 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 01:55yes193 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 00:26yes237 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 00:46yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 01:25yes2323 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 22:14yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 00:22no025 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 22:50yes2555 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 23:27yes2599 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:09yes1928 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 01:29yes139 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 23:12yes2330 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Barracuda read as Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service
Barracuda Cloud Archiving read as Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service
MailStore read as MailStore Server
Mimecast read as Mimecast Cloud Archive
Proofpoint read as Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Proofpoint Archive read as Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Proofpoint Enterprise Communications Archive read as Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Proofpoint Nuclei Discovery & Archive Suite read as Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Proofpoint Nuclei Suite read as Proofpoint Enterprise Archive
Smarsh read as Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Smarsh Archive read as Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Smarsh Enterprise Platform read as Smarsh Enterprise Archive
Veritas read as Veritas Enterprise Vault
Unresolved, counted raw
ACA Group (ComplianceAlpha)
Actiance Vantage
Aesto, LLC
Alert Software
Arcserve UDP Archiving
Barracuda Archiving Service / Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service
Barracuda Messaging Archive
Bloomberg Vault
Dropsuite Archiving
Hanzo
Hyland Software
IBM Enterprise Content Management
MailArchiva
Mailpiler (Piler)
MailsDaddy Free Email Archiver
Microsoft 365 Archive / Exchange Online Archiving
OpenText Retain / Core Business Communication Archive
Preservica
Quadient
Quadient SA
Quarantix
Roundcube
SAP SE
Sharp Archive
Shield
Slack’s native archive
Smarsh SMB offerings
SocialRails
Systools Outlook PST Viewer
TeleMessage (Smarsh Capture Mobile)
ZixArchive
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.

Follow Communications archiving and compliance

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this category moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

← Client-side protectionCompliance automation →