Veritas · 1 category · RankedVeritas Enterprise Vault
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Communications archiving and compliance | Security operations | 0% | 94 of 101 | 38% | 13 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Veritas Enterprise Vault across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Veritas if your organization is heavily invested in Microsoft 365” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Comms archiving · comparative prompt · alternative
“Large legacy on-premises Exchange estate? → Veritas Enterprise Vault.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comms archiving · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“This is one of the most frequently flagged platforms in my research... The platforms listed above (especially Veritas Enterprise Vault) are the ones most frequently flagged in my research as having meaningful, persistent concerns” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comms archiving · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid deploying new on-premises installations.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comms archiving · negative prompt · hard negative
“often considered complex and resource-intensive to manage. It may not be the best fit for organizations seeking a modern, cloud-based, or user-friendly solution.” Mistral Small · Comms archiving · negative prompt · soft negative
“Described as expensive with scalability issues and a setup that "is not as straightforward as it used to be."” Kimi K2 · Comms archiving · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Veritas Enterprise Vault, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Veritas Enterprise Vault was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named Veritas Enterprise Vault and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
140 of the 140 domain citations in answers naming Veritas Enterprise Vault came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
veritas.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Veritas Enterprise Vault takes 0% of first choices and Smarsh Enterprise Archive takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 90 a month (“veritas enterprise vault”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Its company's site
- veritas.com shared with Veritas's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 32,003 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,251 · 203 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,128
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 30 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 30 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Veritas Enterprise Vault
Follow Veritas Enterprise Vault
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Veritas Enterprise Vault's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Veritas Enterprise Vault, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Veritas Enterprise Vault by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Veritas Enterprise Vault is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Veritas Enterprise Vault, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.