| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Communications archiving and compliance | Security operations | 8% | 4 of 101 | 18% | 17 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“start with MailStore Server (if you can handle on-premises) or Google Vault (if already using Google Workspace)” MiniMax M2.5 · Comms archiving · budget prompt · first choice
“Google Vault stands out as the best communications archiving platform for a company with a limited budget” Grok 4.20 · Comms archiving · budget prompt · first choice
“Google Vault is often recommended as a cost-effective communications archiving solution” Mistral Small · Comms archiving · budget prompt · first choice
“Google Vault for Google Workspace—unless you have regulated recordkeeping” GPT-6 Luna · Comms archiving · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“built-in tools like Microsoft 365 retention, Google Vault, and Slack’s native archive are repeatedly described as insufficient for full compliance” Perplexity Sonar · Comms archiving · negative prompt · soft negative
“Limitation: Less robust than dedicated platforms for regulated industries” Kimi K2 · Comms archiving · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Google Vault will not easily archive MS Teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comms archiving · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 60 of the 60 answers that named Google Vault and are not a share of its labels.
229 of the 229 domain citations in answers naming Google Vault came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Vault's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Vault, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Vault by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: