AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Global Relay · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Global Relay

96Judge labels
10First choices
19Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
14% in Comms archiving for enterprise buyers
Rank 9 of 101 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 32 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Global Relay →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In comms archiving · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Global Relay for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Communications archiving and complianceSecurity operations3%9 of 10112%32accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Global Relay yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Global Relay across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash11024
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast03104
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201214
GLM 4.7 FlashX10012
MiniMax M2.511103
GPT-6 Luna12104
Muse Glimmer 30B02002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct23 labels6
Paraphrase7 labelsNone
Comparative26 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labels2
Scale-constrained17 labels2
Negative14 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative96 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Global Relay if you want a regulated-firm-focused archive with especially strong unified capture and surveillance across channels.” GPT-5.4 mini · Comms archiving · comparative prompt · first choice
“Smarsh or Global Relay offer the best balance of comprehensive features, proven reliability, and scalability.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Comms archiving · direct prompt · first choice
“For broad multichannel compliance, start with Smarsh and Global Relay” GPT-6 Luna · Comms archiving · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest evaluating Smarsh or Global Relay first” MiniMax M2.5 · Comms archiving · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Enterprise-grade compliance giants like Smarsh or Global Relay are often too expensive and complex for tighter budgets.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comms archiving · budget prompt · soft negative
“significant download costs that effectively hold archived records hostage when switching vendors” Kimi K2 · Comms archiving · negative prompt · soft negative
“customers report auto-renewal problems and difficulty canceling services they no longer need” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Comms archiving · negative prompt · soft negative
“notoriously complex to implement and often charge heavy fees for "connectors"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comms archiving · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Global Relay, over the 96 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Global Relay was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Smarsh Enterprise Archive91 of 9614Not among the top eight
Proofpoint Enterprise Archive67 of 9612Not among the top eight
Mimecast Cloud Archive52 of 966Not among the top eight
Microsoft Purview45 of 969Not among the top eight
Jatheon40 of 965Not among the top eight
Google Vault24 of 967Not among the top eight
Archive36022 of 961Not among the top eight
Theta Lake21 of 960Not among the top eight
Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service18 of 962Not among the top eight
Veritas Enterprise Vault17 of 961Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Global Relay. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 94 of the 96 answers that named Global Relay and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

globalrelay.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Global Relay takes 3% of first choices and Smarsh Enterprise Archive takes 20%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “communications archiving platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “communications archiving platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
6,600 a month (“global relay”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
89 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 21,100 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,332 · 144 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,400
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
33 ads · 27 text, 6 image · 3 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2023, as Global Relay Communications Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 3 in the year, 30 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
3%
rank 9 of 101 in comms archiving
Segment leader
20%
Smarsh Enterprise Archive
First choices
10 across its categories
Named in
96 answers
Its own site cited
in 94 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on globalrelay.com
8,638
subdomains included
Content
7,042
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
30 · 69
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog6,419432026-10-02TPRM, PAM
Podcast or video30422026-09-11
Webinar or virtual event11852026-09-23
Conference or event101192026-09-30
Glossary or explainer4922026-09-28
Comparison2022026-09-16
Report or ebook1232026-09-21
News or press802025-07-29
Case study602026-05-19
Template or tool512026-07-14

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on globalrelay.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page globalrelay.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Global Relay

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Global Relay is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The leading provider of compliant electronic communications archiving, messaging, supervision, and eDiscovery.
For
the world’s largest and most regulated organizations
Free plan or trial
Try our demo globalrelay.com/solutions
Integrations claimed
70 globalrelay.com
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRCCPA
Customers named
BairdCommonwealth Financial NetworkHelzbergHines SecuritiesValero
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, hosting

What Global Relay's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: globalrelay.com, trust.globalrelay.com, globalrelay.com/solutions, globalrelay.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Global Relay's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Global Relay, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Global Relay by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Global Relay is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Global Relay, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at globalrelay.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.