Every category where a model named Archer Business Resiliency for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Business continuity management	Security operations	0%	67 of 114	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by LogicManager at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Archer Business Resiliency yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Archer Business Resiliency across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Archer excels at structured governance, audit trails, and regulatory compliance.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Business continuity · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“scrutinize it if you're a small team, don't already use Archer, or need a quick, low-effort rollout” GPT-6 Luna · Business continuity · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Archer Business Resiliency, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Archer Business Resiliency was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Fusion Risk Management18 of 237Not among the top eight

Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience16 of 231Not among the top eight

ServiceNow BCM10 of 231Not among the top eight

Everbridge 3606 of 230Not among the top eight

SafetyCulture5 of 233Not among the top eight

BC in the Cloud4 of 230Not among the top eight

MetricStream Business Continuity Management4 of 230Not among the top eight

ServiceNow Business Continuity Management3 of 232Not among the top eight

IBM OpenPages3 of 230Not among the top eight

LogicManager3 of 230Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Archer Business Resiliency. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named Archer Business Resiliency and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

riskpublishing.com17

sprinto.com14

fortiv.io13

em360tech.com11

surecloud.com10

us.fitgap.com10

learn.g2.com9

expertinsights.com8

gartner.com8

mitratech.com8

No domain is on file for Archer Business Resiliency, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

riskpublishing.com/best-business-continuity-management-software-compared17

sprinto.com/blog/business-continuity-management-software14

fortiv.io/blog/best-business-continuity-software12

em360tech.com/top-10/business-continuity-platforms11

surecloud.com/blog-hub/business-continuity-management-software-compared10

learn.g2.com/best-business-continuity-management-software9

clickup.com/blog/business-continuity-management-tools7

guideflow.com/blog/business-continuity-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Archer Business Resiliency stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“archer business resiliency”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 67 of 114 in business continuity

Segment leader

24%

LogicManager

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 23 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Archer Business Resiliency

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Archer Business Resiliency's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Archer Business Resiliency, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Archer Business Resiliency by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Archer Business Resiliency is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Archer Business Resiliency, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.