Process mining · October 2026 Edition
Apromore vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Two of fourteen models named Apromore first on the direct prompt; zero named SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. Apromore was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence by fourteen and Apromore carries 37 labels and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence 47, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
criticized challengerNamed in one category this edition.
First-choice share19%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%30%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#6A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels3747A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Apromore reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.UiPath Process Mining was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Apromore vs Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining · Apromore vs IBM Process Mining · Apromore vs UiPath Process Mining
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ApromoreFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSAP Signavio Process IntelligenceDirect204 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Paraphrase022 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Comparative02
Budget-constrained802 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Scale-constrained101 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Negative001 against Apromore · 5 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Apromore and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence were named in the same answer sixty-six times, of the 95 answers naming Apromore and the 144 naming SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. In those answers SAP Signavio Process Intelligence took the first choice three times and Apromore ten.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Apromore and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence stood in it.
| Model | DirectSS | ParaphraseSS | ComparativeSS | Budget-constrainedSS | Scale-constrainedSS | NegativeSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | SS | | SS | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | SS | SS | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | SS | SS | SS | SS | SS |
| Perplexity Sonar | SS | SS | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | SS | SS | SS | | | SS |
| Mistral Small | SS | SS | SS | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | SS | SS | SS | SS | SS | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | SS | SS | SS | | SS | |
| Kimi K2 | SS | SS | SS | | SS | SS |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | SS | SS | SS | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | SS | SS | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | SS | SS | SS | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | SS |
ApromoreSS SAP Signavio Process Intelligence first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Apromore on the left and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Apromore and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence stood in it.
Apromore first, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence an alternative
2 of 14 modelsSAP Signavio Process Intelligence was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.MiniMax M2.5Apromore, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining
GPT-6 LunaApromore alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Neither was the first choice, one was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Microsoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, ProcessMind, QPR ProcessAnalyzer
GPT-5.4 miniUiPath Process Mining alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, KYP.ai, UiPath Process Mining
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Grok 4.1 FastMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining
Mistral SmallCelonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Qwen 3.7 FlashEverflow Process Intelligence, ProcessMaker alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Kimi K2Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Mindzie alternatives: Apromore, MEHRWERK, QPR ProcessAnalyzer
GLM 4.7 FlashXMindzie alternatives: ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate
Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Mindzie, Minit, ProcessMind
Llama 4 MaverickProcessMaker
Muse Glimmer 30BDecisions, ProcessMaker alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Noxus
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Apromore leads by twelve points.
Apromore12%#3 of 12SAP Signavio Process Intelligence0%#12 of 12
The full small business standing →Mid-marketThe figures above
Apromore leads by sixteen points.
Apromore19%#1 of 9SAP Signavio Process Intelligence3%#6 of 9
The full mid-market standing →Enterprise
The order flips: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence leads at enterprise.
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence7%#3 of 8
Apromore0%#7 of 8What the models said about Apromore
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Limited compared to commercial version; requires technical expertise” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Mid-Market & Agile Specialized Tools (e.g., Apromore, Fluxicon Disco, IBM Process Mining): Often much faster to implement, cost-effective” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Apromore's free Community Edition if you have some technical capability” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“For most budget-conscious companies, I'd recommend starting with Apromore Community Edition” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“SAP Signavio | $150K–$700K/year | Heavy SAP-native positioning; enterprise price tags” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“SAP Signavio ($150K–$700K/year) are far out of scope for most limited budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“$150K–$700K/year — only makes sense if you're deeply invested in SAP.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“If your stack is primarily SAP and you are planning a massive ERP migration: Choose SAP Signavio.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“SAP Signavio for SAP-aligned process mining + modelling + simulation with collaborative governance” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“### 1. SAP Signavio – *Best if you use SAP or need end-to-end modeling*” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Apromore vs Microsoft Power Automate Process MiningApromore vs IBM Process MiningApromore vs UiPath Process MiningApromore vs Microsoft Power AutomateApromore vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformApromore vs PM4PyMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceIBM Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceUiPath Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceMicrosoft Power Automate vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceSAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformSAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs PM4PyAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full process mining standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.