Zero of fourteen models named SAP Signavio Process Intelligence first on the direct prompt; zero named PM4Py. SAP Signavio Process Intelligence was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and PM4Py by ten and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence carries 47 labels and PM4Py 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.
| Model | DirectSSPM | ParaphraseSSPM | ComparativeSSPM | Budget-constrainedSSPM | Scale-constrainedSSPM | NegativeSSPM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | SS | PM | SS | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | SS | SS | PM | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | SS | SS | SSPM | SS | SS | |
| Perplexity Sonar | SS | SS | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | SS | SS | SS | PM | SS | |
| Mistral Small | SS | SS | SS | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | SS | SS | SS | SSPM | SS | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | SS | SS | SS | PM | SSPM | |
| Kimi K2 | SS | SS | SS | PM | SS | SSPM |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | SS | SS | SSPM | PM | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | SS | SS | PM | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | SS | SS | SS | PM | PM | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | SS |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“SAP Signavio | $150K–$700K/year | Heavy SAP-native positioning; enterprise price tags” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“SAP Signavio ($150K–$700K/year) are far out of scope for most limited budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“$150K–$700K/year — only makes sense if you're deeply invested in SAP.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“If your stack is primarily SAP and you are planning a massive ERP migration: Choose SAP Signavio.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“SAP Signavio for SAP-aligned process mining + modelling + simulation with collaborative governance” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“### 1. SAP Signavio – *Best if you use SAP or need end-to-end modeling*” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“No graphical user interface – Requires programming knowledge and development skills” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Open Source Tools (Avoid if You Don't Have Developers)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Open-source libraries such as PM4Py, if you expect a turnkey business app... a library may leave you responsible for building the interface” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best low-budget starting point: PM4Py—if your company has someone comfortable with Python and data preparation.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have technical/data science resources, PM4Py offers the most power and flexibility at zero cost.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · alternative
“PM4Py is the leading open-source library for process mining in Python. It is completely free” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.