Zero of fourteen models named IBM Process Mining first on the direct prompt; zero named SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. Both were named by all fourteen models and IBM Process Mining carries 37 labels and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence 47, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, IBM Process Mining and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence were named in the same answer eighty-two times, of the 107 answers naming IBM Process Mining and the 144 naming SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. In those answers SAP Signavio Process Intelligence took the first choice five times and IBM Process Mining seven.
| Model | DirectIPSS | ParaphraseIPSS | ComparativeIPSS | Budget-constrainedIPSS | Scale-constrainedIPSS | NegativeIPSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | IPSS | IPSS | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | SS | SS | IP | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | SS | IPSS | SS | IPSS | IPSS | |
| Perplexity Sonar | SS | IP | SS | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | SS | IPSS | IPSS | IP | SS | |
| Mistral Small | SS | IPSS | SS | IP | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | IPSS | IPSS | SS | IPSS | SS | IP |
| Llama 4 Maverick | IP | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | SS | IPSS | IPSS | IPSS | ||
| Kimi K2 | SS | IPSS | SS | IPSS | IPSS | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | SS | SS | IPSS | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | IP | IPSS | SS | IP | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | SS | SS | SS | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | IP | IPSS | IP |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What I would avoid on a limited budget: Celonis, IBM Process Mining, and similar enterprise suites” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
“~$4,250/month and enterprise-governance-focused — overkill for most mid-market teams.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“IBM Process Mining starts at ~$4,250/month — still expensive for SMBs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“I would recommend IBM Process Mining if you want a process intelligence platform that is explicitly described as *tailored more to midsize organizations*” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, IBM Process Mining or SAP Signavio are the best recommendations.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Mid-Market & Agile Specialized Tools (e.g., Apromore, Fluxicon Disco, IBM Process Mining)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“SAP Signavio | $150K–$700K/year | Heavy SAP-native positioning; enterprise price tags” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“SAP Signavio ($150K–$700K/year) are far out of scope for most limited budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“$150K–$700K/year — only makes sense if you're deeply invested in SAP.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“If your stack is primarily SAP and you are planning a massive ERP migration: Choose SAP Signavio.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“SAP Signavio for SAP-aligned process mining + modelling + simulation with collaborative governance” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“### 1. SAP Signavio – *Best if you use SAP or need end-to-end modeling*” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.