Index › IT operations and endpoint › Process mining › Microsoft Power Automate vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Process mining · October 2026 Edition
Microsoft Power Automate vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Two of fourteen models named Microsoft Power Automate first on the direct prompt; zero named SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. Microsoft Power Automate was named by nine of the fourteen models and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence by fourteen and Microsoft Power Automate carries 14 labels and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence 47, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
criticized challengerNamed in one category this edition.
First-choice share5%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%30%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels1447A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Microsoft Power Automate reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.UiPath Process Mining was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Apromore vs Microsoft Power Automate · Apromore vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence · Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Microsoft Power Automate
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Microsoft Power AutomateFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSAP Signavio Process IntelligenceDirect204 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Paraphrase022 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Comparative02
Budget-constrained102 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Scale-constrained001 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Negative001 against Microsoft Power Automate · 5 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Microsoft Power Automate and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence were named in the same answer forty times, of the 333 answers naming Microsoft Power Automate and the 144 naming SAP Signavio Process Intelligence. In those answers SAP Signavio Process Intelligence took the first choice zero times and Microsoft Power Automate nine.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Microsoft Power Automate and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence stood in it.
| Model | DirectSS | ParaphraseSS | ComparativeSS | Budget-constrainedSS | Scale-constrainedSS | NegativeSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | SS | SS | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | SS | SS | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | SS | SS | SS | SS | SS | |
| Perplexity Sonar | SS | SS | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | SS | SS | SS | | SS | |
| Mistral Small | SS | SS | SS | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | SS | SS | SS | SS | SS | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | SS | SS | SS | SS | ||
| Kimi K2 | SS | SS | SS | SS | SS | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | SS | SS | SS | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | SS | SS | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | SS | SS | SS | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | SS | |
Microsoft Power AutomateSS SAP Signavio Process Intelligence first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Microsoft Power Automate on the left and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Microsoft Power Automate and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence stood in it.
Microsoft Power Automate first, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence not the choice
2 of 14 modelsSAP Signavio Process Intelligence was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Microsoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, ProcessMind, QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Grok 4.1 FastMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniUiPath Process Mining alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Mistral SmallCelonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Qwen 3.7 FlashEverflow Process Intelligence, ProcessMaker alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
GLM 4.7 FlashXMindzie alternatives: ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate
GPT-6 LunaApromore alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, KYP.ai, UiPath Process Mining
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Mindzie, Minit, ProcessMind
Llama 4 MaverickProcessMaker
Kimi K2Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Mindzie alternatives: Apromore, MEHRWERK, QPR ProcessAnalyzer
MiniMax M2.5Apromore, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining
Muse Glimmer 30BDecisions, ProcessMaker alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Noxus
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Microsoft Power Automate leads by twenty-five points.
Microsoft Power Automate25%#1 of 12SAP Signavio Process Intelligence0%#12 of 12
The full small business standing →Mid-marketThe figures above
Microsoft Power Automate leads by two points.
Microsoft Power Automate5%#5 of 9SAP Signavio Process Intelligence3%#6 of 9
The full mid-market standing →Enterprise
The order flips: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence leads at enterprise.
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence7%#3 of 8
Microsoft Power Automate0%#6 of 8What the models said about Microsoft Power Automate
No label in this category carried a quote.
What the models said about SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“SAP Signavio | $150K–$700K/year | Heavy SAP-native positioning; enterprise price tags” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“SAP Signavio ($150K–$700K/year) are far out of scope for most limited budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“$150K–$700K/year — only makes sense if you're deeply invested in SAP.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“If your stack is primarily SAP and you are planning a massive ERP migration: Choose SAP Signavio.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“SAP Signavio for SAP-aligned process mining + modelling + simulation with collaborative governance” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“### 1. SAP Signavio – *Best if you use SAP or need end-to-end modeling*” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Apromore vs Microsoft Power AutomateApromore vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Microsoft Power AutomateMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceIBM Process Mining vs Microsoft Power AutomateIBM Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceUiPath Process Mining vs Microsoft Power AutomateUiPath Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceMicrosoft Power Automate vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformMicrosoft Power Automate vs PM4PySAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformSAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs PM4PyAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full process mining standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.