AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › IT operations and endpoint › Process mining › SAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Process mining · October 2026 Edition

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs Celonis Process Intelligence Platform

Zero of fourteen models named SAP Signavio Process Intelligence first on the direct prompt; two named Celonis Process Intelligence Platform. Both were named by all fourteen models and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence carries 47 labels and Celonis Process Intelligence Platform 64, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Named in one category this edition.

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share3%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate30%52%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels4764A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.UiPath Process Mining was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Apromore vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence · Apromore vs Celonis Process Intelligence Platform · Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SAP Signavio Process IntelligenceFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCelonis Process Intelligence Platform
Direct024 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence · 9 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Paraphrase202 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence · 6 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Comparative213
Budget-constrained002 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence · 5 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Scale-constrained001 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence · 3 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Negative005 against SAP Signavio Process Intelligence · 10 against Celonis Process Intelligence Platform
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence and Celonis Process Intelligence Platform were named in the same answer 142 times, of the 144 answers naming SAP Signavio Process Intelligence and the 191 naming Celonis Process Intelligence Platform. In those answers Celonis Process Intelligence Platform took the first choice fifty-four times and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence four.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where SAP Signavio Process Intelligence and Celonis Process Intelligence Platform stood in it.
ModelDirectSSParaphraseSSComparativeSSBudget-constrainedSSScale-constrainedSSNegativeSS
Claude Haiku 4.5SSSS
GPT-5.4 miniSSSS
Gemini 3.5 FlashSSSSSSSSSS
Perplexity SonarSSSS
Grok 4.1 FastSSSSSSSS
Mistral SmallSSSSSS
DeepSeek V4 FlashSSSSSSSSSS
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 FlashSSSSSSSS
Kimi K2SSSSSSSSSS
GLM 4.7 FlashXSSSSSS
MiniMax M2.5SSSS
GPT-6 LunaSSSSSS
Muse Glimmer 30BSS
SS SAP Signavio Process Intelligence Celonis Process Intelligence PlatformSS first choiceSS named as an alternativeSS argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence on the left and Celonis Process Intelligence Platform on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where SAP Signavio Process Intelligence and Celonis Process Intelligence Platform stood in it.

Celonis Process Intelligence Platform first, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence an alternative

2 of 14 modelsSAP Signavio Process Intelligence was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallCelonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
MiniMax M2.5Apromore, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniUiPath Process Mining alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Qwen 3.7 FlashEverflow Process Intelligence, ProcessMaker alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
GPT-6 LunaApromore alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Microsoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, ProcessMind, QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, KYP.ai, UiPath Process Mining
Grok 4.1 FastMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Mindzie, Minit, ProcessMind
Llama 4 MaverickProcessMaker
Kimi K2Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Mindzie alternatives: Apromore, MEHRWERK, QPR ProcessAnalyzer
GLM 4.7 FlashXMindzie alternatives: ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate
Muse Glimmer 30BDecisions, ProcessMaker alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Noxus

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform leads by four points.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform4%#7 of 12
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence0%#12 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence3%#6 of 9
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform3%#7 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform leads by sixty points.
Celonis Process Intelligence Platform67%#1 of 8
SAP Signavio Process Intelligence7%#3 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“SAP Signavio | $150K–$700K/year | Heavy SAP-native positioning; enterprise price tags” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“SAP Signavio ($150K–$700K/year) are far out of scope for most limited budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“$150K–$700K/year — only makes sense if you're deeply invested in SAP.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“If your stack is primarily SAP and you are planning a massive ERP migration: Choose SAP Signavio.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“SAP Signavio for SAP-aligned process mining + modelling + simulation with collaborative governance” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“### 1. SAP Signavio – *Best if you use SAP or need end-to-end modeling*” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Celonis Process Intelligence Platform

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“What to Avoid (Unless You Have the Budget) ... Celonis | $60K–$100K/year + $40K–$80K implementation | Case-volume pricing adds up fast; opaque enterprise sales” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“What I would avoid on a limited budget: Celonis, IBM Process Mining, and similar enterprise suites” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
“avoid enterprise-first tools like Celonis, which are often described as more expensive” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“The undisputed heavyweight market leader... If you have a highly complex, multi-vendor IT architecture and a large budget... Choose Celonis.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Celonis — The Market Leader ... Key Differentiator: Deep execution management with AI-powered recommendations and the broadest ecosystem” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Celonis remains the undisputed heavyweight, commanding a 31.2% market share through its sophisticated Execution Management System (EMS)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.