AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › IT operations and endpoint › Process mining › Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Microsoft Power Automate
Process mining · October 2026 Edition

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs Microsoft Power Automate

Four of fourteen models named Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining first on the direct prompt; two named Microsoft Power Automate. Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Microsoft Power Automate by nine and Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining carries 21 labels and Microsoft Power Automate 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Named in one category this edition.

Microsoft Power Automate

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share14%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels2114A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.UiPath Process Mining was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Apromore vs Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining · Apromore vs Microsoft Power Automate · Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining vs IBM Process Mining

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the process mining page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Microsoft Power Automate Process MiningFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMicrosoft Power Automate
Direct42
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained211 against Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
Scale-constrained10
Negative002 against Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining · 1 against Microsoft Power Automate
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and Microsoft Power Automate stood in it.
ModelDirectMPParaphraseMPComparativeMPBudget-constrainedMPScale-constrainedMPNegativeMP
Claude Haiku 4.5MP
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 FlashMPMPMPMPMP
Perplexity SonarMPMPMP
Grok 4.1 FastMP
Mistral SmallMP
DeepSeek V4 FlashMPMP
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2MPMP
GLM 4.7 FlashXMP
MiniMax M2.5MP
GPT-6 LunaMPMPMP
Muse Glimmer 30BMP
MP Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining Microsoft Power AutomateMP first choiceMP named as an alternativeMP argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining on the left and Microsoft Power Automate on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining and Microsoft Power Automate stood in it.

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining first, Microsoft Power Automate not the choice

4 of 14 modelsMicrosoft Power Automate was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: Apromore, KYP.ai, UiPath Process Mining
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining alternatives: Mindzie, Minit, ProcessMind
Kimi K2Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Mindzie alternatives: Apromore, MEHRWERK, QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Microsoft Power Automate first, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining not the choice

2 of 14 modelsMicrosoft Power Automate Process Mining was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Microsoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, ProcessMind, QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Grok 4.1 FastMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: Apromore, UiPath Process Mining

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GLM 4.7 FlashXMindzie alternatives: ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate
MiniMax M2.5Apromore, Celonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining
Muse Glimmer 30BDecisions, ProcessMaker alternatives: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, Noxus

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniUiPath Process Mining alternatives: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
Mistral SmallCelonis Process Intelligence Platform alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
Llama 4 MaverickProcessMaker
Qwen 3.7 FlashEverflow Process Intelligence, ProcessMaker alternatives: SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
GPT-6 LunaApromore alternatives: Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Microsoft Power Automate leads by seventeen points.
Microsoft Power Automate25%#1 of 12
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining8%#4 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining leads at mid-market.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining14%#2 of 9
Microsoft Power Automate5%#5 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining leads by twenty points.
Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining20%#2 of 8
Microsoft Power Automate0%#6 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Avoid or be cautious with Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining if you expect high volumes” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“I wouldn’t start with Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining if the budget is especially tight” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“it can carry heavy add-on licensing costs (such as a $5,000/month tenant capacity add-on)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best for Microsoft-Centric Companies: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining ... this is the most seamless and cost-effective commercial option.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall & Best for Microsoft Ecosystems: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining (formerly Minit)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“UiPath Process Mining or Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining are the safest bets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Microsoft Power Automate

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.