Application performance monitoring for small business buyers
Asked as “APM tool”, and as “application performance monitoring solution”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 62 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
53%
Clear leader
53New Relic15Sentry06Datadog APM26others
53% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▲+1Since September 2026: 51% → 52%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.New Relic held the lead, +1 point on 51%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
New Relic53%Clear leader▲+1Since September 2026: 51% → 52%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketNew Relic46%Clear leader▼−5Since September 2026: 54% → 49%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
Dynatrace47%Clear leader▲+1Since September 2026: 46% → 46%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
New Relic53%Clear leader▲+1Since September 2026: 51% → 52%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketNew Relic46%Clear leader▼−5Since September 2026: 54% → 49%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseDynatrace47%Clear leader▲+1Since September 2026: 46% → 46%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01New Relic53%12%72endorsed leader▲+1Since September 2026: 51% → 52%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.51% → 52%
New Relic53%12%72endorsed leader▲+1Since September 2026: 51% → 52%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.51% → 52%02
Sentry15%11%36accepted challenger▲+10Since September 2026: 6% → 17%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 17%
Sentry15%11%36accepted challenger▲+10Since September 2026: 6% → 17%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 17%03
SigNoz6%3%33accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 4%
SigNoz6%3%33accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 4%04
Datadog APM6%61%66criticized challenger▼−10Since September 2026: 17% → 7%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.17% → 7%
Datadog APM6%61%66criticized challenger▼−10Since September 2026: 17% → 7%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.17% → 7%05
Elastic APM5%12%17accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 6%
Elastic APM5%12%17accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 6%06
Grafana Cloud3%17%29accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
Grafana Cloud3%17%29accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
AppDynamics0%80%25criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
AppDynamics0%80%25criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10Dynatrace0%76%34criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Dynatrace0%76%34criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
Scout APM0%0%11accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%
Scout APM0%0%11accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%08
AppSignal0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
AppSignal0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
New Relic vs Elastic APMNew Relic vs IBM InstanaNew Relic vs Grafana CloudNew Relic vs HoneycombDatadog APM vs SigNozDatadog APM vs Site24x7Datadog APM vs Elastic APMDatadog APM vs IBM InstanaDatadog APM vs Grafana CloudDatadog APM vs HoneycombSigNoz vs Site24x7SigNoz vs Elastic APMSigNoz vs IBM InstanaSigNoz vs Grafana CloudSigNoz vs HoneycombSite24x7 vs Elastic APMSite24x7 vs IBM InstanaSite24x7 vs Grafana CloudSite24x7 vs HoneycombElastic APM vs IBM InstanaElastic APM vs Grafana CloudElastic APM vs HoneycombIBM Instana vs Grafana CloudIBM Instana vs HoneycombGrafana Cloud vs Honeycomb
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01New Relic53%
New Relic53%02Sentry15%
Sentry15%03SigNoz6%
SigNoz6%04Datadog APM6%
Datadog APM6%05Elastic APM5%
Elastic APM5%06Grafana Cloud3%
Grafana Cloud3%07Scout APM0%
Scout APM0%08AppSignal0%
AppSignal0%09AppDynamics0%
AppDynamics0%10Dynatrace0%
Dynatrace0%What they warned about
Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Dynatrace76%
26 of 34 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 11 hard negative
“APM tools a small business should avoid or be cautious about ... Dynatrace | Steep learning curve ... expensive for smaller organizations” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Datadog APM61%
40 of 66 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“What to Avoid for a Small B2B Team ... **Datadog** — unless you have a large, complex microservices architecture already” DeepSeek V4 Flash, direct prompt
AppDynamics80%
20 of 25 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 11 hard negative
“then AppDynamics and Instana — mainly because of usage-based pricing blowups, enterprise-oriented licensing models” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
New Relic12%
9 of 72 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Expensive for small teams ... scaling costs quickly become prohibitive” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 988 links across 186 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 10 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G243 answers · 86 citations · 12 models
vendor site · New Relic40 answers · 80 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Motadata32 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ManageEngine29 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Uptrace26 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
vendor site · CubeAPM25 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · OpenObserve25 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Atatus23 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Middleware.io23 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Instatus15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · SigNoz14 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
28 answers · 9 models
26 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “apm tool”, “apm tools”, “best apm tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Relic newrelic.com | 53% | 629 | 14,800 | 843 | 83,276 | $412 | 89 | 4 |
| Sentry sentry.io | 15% | 269 | 90,500 | 21,086 | 254,686 | 120 | ||
| SigNoz signoz.io | 6% | 208 | 2,400 | 52 | 7,244 | 1 | 5 | |
| Datadog datadoghq.com Datadog APM 6% | 6% | 186 | 74,000 | 3,541 | 159,408 company | $633 | 120 | |
| Elastic elastic.co Elastic APM 5% | 5% | 49 | 74,000 | 34,672 | 208,306 company | 105 | ||
| OpenObserve openobserve.ai | 5% | 157 | 1,600 | 9 | 4,825 | 7 | 5 | |
| Grafana Cloud grafana.com Grafana Cloud 3%, Grafana Stack 2%, Prometheus + Grafana 0%, Grafana + Prometheus 0% | 5% | 174 | 2,400 | 40 | 84,520 | 116 | ||
| Atatus atatus.com | 3% | 21 | 90 | 10 | 2,881 | |||
| Uptrace uptrace.dev | 2% | 58 | 210 | 3 | 7,088 | |||
| Scout scoutapm.com Scout APM 0% | 0% | 18 | 170 | 0 | 4,420 company | 1 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 15 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (manageengine.com, motadata.com, newrelic.com, openobserve.ai, signoz.io). The first result for “apm tool” is blazemeter.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best APM tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which application performance monitoring solution would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top APM tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best APM tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a APM tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which APM tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Datadog APM, New Relicagainst: AppDynamics, DynatraceElastic APM, New RelicChangedagainst: AppDynamics, DynatraceScout APMagainst: Datadog APMNew Relicno first choiceagainst: Datadog APM, Dynatrace, IBM Instana, Sumo Logic
One alternative
Prometheus + GrafanaOne alternative
Datadog APMThree alternatives
AppSignal, Honeybadger, SentryThree alternatives
Elastic APM, Prometheus + Grafana, SentryGPT-5.4 miniNew RelicNew RelicHeldDatadog APMNew Relicagainst: Datadog APMno first choiceagainst: AppDynamics, Dynatrace
Two alternatives
Datadog APM, Elastic APMThree alternatives
AppDynamics, Datadog APM, Splunk Observability CloudFive alternatives
Alloy, Grafana Cloud, Grafana/Tempo, New Relic, SigNozTwo alternatives
Elastic APM, Grafana CloudGemini 3.5 FlashSentryagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog APM, DynatraceSentryHeldagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog APM, DynatraceAppSignal, Sentryagainst: Datadog APMGrafana Cloud, New Relicagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog APM, Dynatrace, SentryNew Relic, Sentryagainst: Datadog APM, Grafana Cloud, Prometheusagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog APM, Dynatrace, Grafana Cloud, Jaeger, New Relic, Prometheus, SigNoz
Three alternatives
New Relic, Scout APM, SigNozTwo alternatives
Honeycomb, New RelicFour alternatives
New Relic, OpenObserve, Scout APM, SigNozFour alternatives
GlitchTip, Honeycomb, OpenObserve, SigNozThree alternatives
Honeycomb, OpenObserve, SigNozPerplexity SonarNew RelicNew RelicHeldNew Relic, Scout APMagainst: Datadog APMNew Relic, Sentryno first choiceagainst: AppDynamics, Dynatrace, IBM Instana, SAP Asset Performance Management, Sentry
Two alternatives
Datadog APM, UptraceThree alternatives
Datadog APM, ManageEngine OpManager Nexus, Site24x7Four alternatives
AppSignal, Better Stack, Sentry, UptraceTwo alternatives
ManageEngine Applications Manager, SigNozGrok 4.1 FastGrafana Cloud, SigNozagainst: Datadog APM, New RelicNew RelicChangedagainst: Datadog APMNew Relic, Sentryagainst: Datadog APM, DynatraceNew Relicagainst: Datadog APM, Elastic APM, Grafana CloudSigNozagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog APM, Dynatrace, New Relic, Splunk Observability Cloud
Three alternatives
ManageEngine Applications Manager, Sentry, SolarWinds AppOpticsThree alternatives
Sentry, SigNoz, Site24x7Three alternatives
Elastic APM, Scout APM, SigNozOne alternative
SigNozTwo alternatives
Datadog APM, New RelicMistral SmallNew RelicSentryChangedSentryagainst: New RelicOpenObserveDatadog APM, Elastic APM, New Relicagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog APM, Dynatrace, IBM Instana, Sentry, Splunk Observability Cloud
Two alternatives
CubeAPM, Datadog APMTwo alternatives
Datadog APM, New RelicThree alternatives
Grafana Cloud, Highlight.io, SigNozThree alternatives
Elastic APM, Grafana Stack, New RelicDeepSeek V4 FlashNew Relicagainst: Datadog APM, DynatraceNew RelicHeldagainst: Datadog APMNew Relicagainst: Datadog APMNew Relicagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog APM, DynatraceNew Relicagainst: Datadog APM, Dynatrace, Grafana Cloud, Grafana Loki, Jaeger, Prometheusagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog APM, Dynatrace, New Relic
Four alternatives
AppSignal, LogRocket, Sentry, Site24x7Two alternatives
Atatus, SentryFour alternatives
Grafana Cloud, Honeycomb, Sentry, SigNozFour alternatives
Elastic APM, Grafana Cloud, Sentry, SigNozFour alternatives
AppSignal, Atatus, Hyperping, Scout APMLlama 4 MaverickOpenObserveno first choiceChangedCubeAPMElastic APM, Grafana Stack, OpenObserveno first choiceagainst: AppDynamics, Dynatrace, Splunk Observability Cloud
Two alternatives
Nexus, SentryThree alternatives
New Relic, Scout APM, UptraceTwo alternatives
Atatus, CoralogixQwen 3.7 FlashNew Relic, Sentryagainst: Datadog APMAtatusChangedagainst: AppDynamics, DynatraceDatadog APM, SentryNew Relicagainst: Datadog APMno first choiceagainst: Datadog APM, Dynatrace, Grafana Cloud, Jaeger, New Relic, Prometheusagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog APM, Dynatrace, Self-Managed ELK Stack, Splunk
One alternative
HoneycombTwo alternatives
Raygun, SigNozThree alternatives
New Relic, Prometheus + Grafana, SigNozFour alternatives
Grafana Cloud, Prometheus, Sentry, SigNozTwo alternatives
Honeycomb, LightstepKimi K2Sentryagainst: Datadog APMSentryHeldagainst: New RelicNew Relic, SigNozagainst: Datadog APM, DynatraceNew Relicno first choiceagainst: Datadog APMagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog APM, Dynatrace, IBM Instana, Sentry
Four alternatives
Grafana Cloud, New Relic, SigNoz, UptraceTwo alternatives
Better Stack, Site24x7Four alternatives
AppSignal, Honeybadger, Scout APM, SentryTwo alternatives
SigNoz, Uptime KumaFour alternatives
Elastic APM, Grafana Cloud, New Relic, SigNozGLM 4.7 FlashXNew Relicagainst: Datadog APMNew RelicHeldDatadog APM, New RelicNew Relicagainst: AppDynamicsUptraceagainst: Datadog APM, Dynatraceagainst: AppDynamics, Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, Splunk Observability Cloud
One alternative
SigNozTwo alternatives
Datadog APM, Site24x7Six alternatives
Atatus, Dynatrace, Grafana LGTM Stack, Prometheus + Grafana, SigNoz, UptraceTwo alternatives
Atatus, Open SourceThree alternatives
Grafana + Prometheus, New Relic, SigNozMiniMax M2.5New Relic, SentryNew RelicChangedagainst: Datadog APM, SplunkAppSignal, Scout APMDatadog APM, New RelicDatadog APMagainst: Dynatracenothing named
Two alternatives
Datadog APM, SolarWinds AppOpticsOne alternative
CubeAPMFive alternatives
Atatus, Datadog APM, Elastic APM, Grafana Cloud, New RelicEight alternatives
AWS X-Ray, Azure Application Insights, Elastic APM, Google Cloud Operations, Jaeger, OpenTelemetry, Prometheus + Grafana, ZipkinThree alternatives
Grafana + Prometheus, Jaeger, New RelicGPT-6 LunaSigNozagainst: Datadog APMNew RelicChangedNew Relicagainst: Datadog APMNew Relicno first choiceagainst: Datadog APM, Dynatrace Full-Stack, New Relic, Splunk Observability Cloud
One alternative
New RelicOne alternative
Datadog APMThree alternatives
Grafana Cloud, Honeycomb, SentryOne alternative
Grafana CloudMuse Glimmer 30BAtatus, New Relicagainst: Datadog APMNew RelicChangedGrafana Cloud, New Relic, Sentryagainst: Datadog APMNew Relic, SigNozno first choiceagainst: Datadog APMagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog APM, Dynatrace, Elastic APM, IBM Instana, New Relic
Two alternatives
Elastic APM, Middleware.ioThree alternatives
Datadog APM, Sentry, SigNozFive alternatives
Better Stack, CubeAPM, Middleware.io, SolarWinds AppOptics, SolarWinds ObservabilityThree alternatives
Grafana Cloud, ManageEngine OpManager Nexus, Prometheus + GrafanaFive alternatives
Grafana Cloud, Middleware.io, New Relic, OpenObserve, SigNozBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:48 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:33 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:58 | yes | 17 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:33 | yes | 21 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:52 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:56 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:08 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:10 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:39 | yes | 20 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:14 | yes | 24 | 48 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:21 | yes | 11 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:37 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:49 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:44 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:50 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:56 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 23 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:59 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 25 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:20 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:59 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:40 | yes | 19 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:15 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 10 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:40 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:55 | yes | 24 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:47 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:44 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:22 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 16 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:36 | yes | 25 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:59 | yes | 13 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 24 | 45 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:35 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 10 | 55 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:56 | yes | 10 | 43 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:43 | yes | 19 | 138 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 17 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:15 | yes | 6 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 15 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 6 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 21 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:14 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:49 | yes | 24 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:14 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:35 | yes | 23 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:16 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:36 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 11 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:50 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:42 | yes | 11 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:32 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:40 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:54 | yes | 7 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 19 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:01 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:46 | yes | 20 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:44 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:26 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:02 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:53 | yes | 20 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:19 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:50 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:33 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:30 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 18 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:33 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:47 | yes | 24 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:20 | yes | 13 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 22 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:00 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:49 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:27 | yes | 24 | 209 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:56 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:41 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Datadog read as Datadog APM
Elastic (ELK Stack) read as Elastic APM
Grafana read as Grafana Cloud
Grafana Cloud / Grafana Stack read as Grafana Cloud
Scout read as Scout APM
Splunk APM read as Splunk Observability Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
Dynatrace Full-Stack
Open Source (Prometheus + Grafana)
SAP Asset Performance Management
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.