Every category where a model named Scout APM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Application performance monitoring	IT operations and endpoint	2%	11 of 70	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 54%
Error and crash monitoring	Developer platform	0%	42 of 44	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Sentry at 82%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Scout APM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Scout APM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 label1

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative8 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labels2

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative11 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“or Scout Monitoring if you want a very low-cost paid plan built for small teams” Perplexity Sonar · APM · budget prompt · first choice

“Atatus or Scout APM provide good comprehensive coverage in the low-cost paid tier” Claude Haiku 4.5 · APM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Scout APM if you need frontend JavaScript error tracking” Mistral Small · Error monitoring · negative prompt · hard negative

“Compatibility limits (Ruby-focused; weak on Java/Go/.NET), missing features, high pricing.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Error monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Scout APM, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Scout APM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

New Relic24 of 297Not in the top three

Datadog23 of 292Not in the top three

Sentry18 of 294Not in the top three

AppSignal13 of 290Not in the top three

SigNoz11 of 290Not in the top three

Dynatrace10 of 291Not in the top three

AppDynamics10 of 290Not in the top three

Grafana Cloud7 of 291Not in the top three

Honeybadger6 of 291Not in the top three

Elastic APM4 of 290Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Scout APM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 29 answers that named Scout APM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

scoutapm.comYour site23

g2.com15

newrelic.com14

rollbar.com14

openobserve.ai13

cubeapm.com11

drizz.dev9

reveillesoftware.com9

atatus.com8

instatus.com8

101 of the 124 domain citations in answers naming Scout APM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

scoutapm.com/blog/best-apm-for-small-teams-202618

newrelic.com/blog/apm/application-performance-monitoring-tools11

openobserve.ai/blog/top-10-apm-tools11

rollbar.com/blog/best-apm-tools11

drizz.dev/post/apm-tools9

g2.com/categories/application-performance-monitoring-apm/small-business9

reveillesoftware.com/blog/blog/14-best-application-performance-monitoring-apm-tools-20249

cubeapm.com/blog/top-apm-tools-features-pricing-usecases8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Scout APM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Scout APM; a claim can dispute any of them.

Scout Monitoring 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Scout APM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Scout APM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at scoutapm.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.