Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 12 of 58
2 categories · RankedAppSignal
21Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in APM for small business buyers
Rank 44 of 66 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business12 of 60
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market44 of 66
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise48 of 59
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In apm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named AppSignal for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application performance monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 44 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 46% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Error and crash monitoring | Developer platform | 0% | 23 of 42 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sentry at 76% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, AppSignal held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · APM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 26 → 41 of 60
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 46 of 57, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 44 of 66 |
| Error monitoring | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 27 → 23 of 42 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated AppSignal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated AppSignal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative7 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative8 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AppSignal, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AppSignal was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AppSignal, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AppSignal was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AppSignal. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named AppSignal and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
scoutapm.com12
g2.com8
newrelic.com8
guideflow.com7
motadata.com7
cubeapm.com6
dupple.com6
openobserve.ai6
atatus.com5
instatus.com5
Seventy of the seventy domain citations in answers naming AppSignal came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
appsignal.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AppSignal takes 0% of first choices and New Relic takes 46%.ShowHide
Search and answers
appsignal.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, AppSignal takes 0% of first choices and New Relic takes 46%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “apm tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “apm tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“appsignal”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 13,372 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,360 · 197 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,424
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 44 of 66 in APM
Segment leader
46%
New Relic
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 21 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on appsignal.com
2,249
subdomains included
Content
1,002
counted in the table below
Documentation
877
Product · Integration
2 · 2
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 905 | 18 | 2026-09-24 | Feature flags, APM | |
| Report or ebook | 31 | 0 | 2022-05-01 | ||
| Comparison | 23 | 1 | 2026-09-08 | APM | |
| Template or tool | 18 | 2 | 2026-08-11 | ||
| Conference or event | 12 | undated | Logs | ||
| Case study | 6 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 0 | 2026-04-01 | APM | |
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2016-01-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Visualize data your way with intelligence dashboards built for your stack blog
- 2026-09-23Add an app with your coding agent blog
- 2026-09-22Distributed tracing for ruby blog
- 2026-09-21Expert context built with gorails blog
- 2026-09-10Appsignal at elixirconf 2026 blog
- 2026-09-08Appsignal vs the tools it replaces pagerduty cronitor rollbar etc comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page appsignal.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow AppSignal
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
AppSignal is its own company.ShowHide
The company
AppSignal is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Error tracking and performance monitoring that just works.
- For
- Ruby, Elixir, Node.js, and Python developers
- Price stated
- Plans starting at $0 · 30-day full-featured trial appsignal.com
- Starting price
- 0 appsignal.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free tier with 30K requests/month appsignal.com
- Integrations claimed
- 6 appsignal.com · 4 appsignal.com/plans pages disagree
- Certifications
- ISO/GDPR compliantGDPR & HIPAA compliantISO 27001 certifiedISO:9001 and ISO:27001 certifiedGDPR compliantHIPAA compliant
- Hosting
- EUthe Netherlandsthe United StatesEU-based
- Customers named
- KairosUpsideMemberKitBenuevoSupertapeAmpla TechnologiesSportsKeyHR Partner
What AppSignal's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: appsignal.com, appsignal.com/plans, appsignal.com/security, appsignal.com/jobs/platform-engineer, appsignal.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AppSignal's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AppSignal, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AppSignal by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where AppSignal is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name AppSignal, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.