Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 → 21 of 58
5 categories · Named, not rankedGrafana + Prometheus
16Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Grafana + Prometheus was named 5 times in APM and 4 other categories, where New Relic led with 46%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business22 of 60
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market48 of 66
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise43 of 59
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In apm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Grafana + Prometheus for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application performance monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 48 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by New Relic at 46% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data quality and observability | Data platform | 0% | 76 of 110 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Metaplane at 31% | |
| Infrastructure monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 65 of 79 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Datadog at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Observability platforms | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 34 of 80 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Grafana at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Website and synthetic monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 47 of 67 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by UptimeRobot at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Grafana + Prometheus held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · APM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 57 → 44 of 60
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 → 41 of 57
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 57 → 48 of 66 |
| Data observability | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 76 of 110, unchanged |
| Infra monitoring | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 65 of 79 |
| Observability | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 34 of 80 |
| Uptime monitoring | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 47 of 67, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Grafana + Prometheus across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Grafana + Prometheus across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative3 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best Budget Option” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Observability · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Open-source control | Free (self-hosted) ... High setup/ops effort; needs SRE skills.” Grok 4.20 · Infra monitoring · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Grafana + Prometheus, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Grafana + Prometheus was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Grafana + Prometheus, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Grafana + Prometheus was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Grafana + Prometheus. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 16 answers that named Grafana + Prometheus and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cubeapm.com6
motadata.com6
uptrace.dev6
devopsschool.com5
dev.to4
drizz.dev4
g2.com4
newrelic.com4
atatus.com3
comparitech.com3
Forty-five of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming Grafana + Prometheus came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
grafana.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Grafana + Prometheus takes 0% of first choices and New Relic takes 46%.ShowHide
Search and answers
grafana.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Grafana + Prometheus takes 0% of first choices and New Relic takes 46%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “apm tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “apm tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 84,520 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 23,340 · 1,526 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 30,353
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 1 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 48 of 66 in APM
Segment leader
46%
New Relic
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on grafana.com
24,060
subdomains included
Content
3,026
counted in the table below
Documentation
7,452
Product · Integration
29 · 139
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,964 | 13 | 2026-09-14 | Observability, SIEM | |
| Conference or event | 537 | 1 | 2026-08-11 | Observability | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 175 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 140 | undated | |||
| News or press | 79 | 5 | 2026-08-01 | Observability | |
| Report or ebook | 78 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 24 | 0 | 2025-09-24 | ||
| Template or tool | 21 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 6 | 1 | 2026-07-10 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2021-04-10 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-14Digital experience monitoring with grafana cloud session replay synthetic checks and faster investigations blog
- 2026-09-10Synthetic monitoring labels update blog
- 2026-09-09How to monitor cypress tests with grafana cloud blog
- 2026-08-27Identify anomalies outlier detection forecasting how grafana cloud uses ai ml to make observability easier blog
- 2026-08-27How to measure and improve instrumentation quality for better full stack observability blog
- 2026-08-25The grafana ai sdk for go a shared foundation for building ai applications blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- March 5, 2026ObservabilityCON on the Road: TorontoDelta Hotels Toronto, Toronto, Canada · hosted
As the event pages on grafana.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page grafana.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Grafana + Prometheus
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Grafana + Prometheus; a claim can dispute any of them.
Grafana/Prometheus 1OpenTelemetry + Grafana/Prometheus 1
Follow Grafana + Prometheus
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Grafana + Prometheus is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Grafana + Prometheus is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI for observability. Observability for AI. One platform for both.
- For
- Self-serve; companies with security, compliance, and deployment requirements
- Price stated
- The Free Forever plan grafana.com
- Starting price
- $0 grafana.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- The Free Forever plan grafana.com
- Certifications
- FEDRAMP CompliantNATSEC100 CertifiedPCI DSS CompliantA-LIGN CertifiedAICPA SOC Type II VerifiedGDPR CompliantSOC 2ISO/IEC 27001
- Hosting
- Public CloudFederal CloudBring Your Own Cloud
- Customers named
- BlackRockPegasystemsLovableLATAM AirlinesDelivery HeroASOSSailpointMux
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What Grafana + Prometheus's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: grafana.com, grafana.com/pricing, trust.grafana.com, grafana.com/products/cloud, grafana.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Grafana + Prometheus's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Grafana + Prometheus, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Grafana + Prometheus by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Grafana + Prometheus is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Grafana + Prometheus, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.